论佛教实现藏族本土化的十大例证——《答关于前弘期密乘的争论》考释  

On Ten Pieces of Evidence of the Localization of Buddhism in Tibetan Areas:An Exploration of the Reply to the Arguments about Tantrayana in the Middle of Seventh Century

作　　者：益卓 Yi Zhuo(School of Philosophy,Southwest Minzu University,Chengdu,610041,Sichuan,China)

机构地区：[1]西南民族大学哲学学院,四川成都610041

出　　处：《民族学刊》2022年第10期99-104,141,共7页Journal of Ethnology

基　　金：西南民族大学中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金研究生创新基金专项目“西藏阿里民间文献《斯巴年绕》的宇宙观研究”(2022SYJSCX41)的阶段性成果。

摘　　要：关于前弘期密乘是否属于佛教正法争论的作品例证不少,如《答关于前弘期密乘的争论》中就涉及到10篇案例,这些争论的焦点主要集中在三个方面:一、哪些是印度人智造的藏译作品,哪些是藏族人智造的母语作品;二、凡是藏人智造的就是伪作,凡是伪作就是邪法,凡是邪法都不会修成正果;三、旧译密续是否为佛教正法的问题,密宗大圆满是否为佛教正法的问题,九乘学说是否为佛教正法的问题。笔者统览《答关于前弘期密乘的争论》中涉及的十大案例后发现,这十大案例既是一种源自本土的西藏佛教与源自外来的印度佛教在青藏高原高峰对话实例,也是一种非常难得的佛教实现藏族本土化进程中高峰对话的代表性实例,加强对这十大案例的研究无疑对推动藏传佛教中国化具有重要的现实意义。There appears to be quite a number of works concerning the scholarly discussion about whether Tantrayana in the middle of the seventh century belonged to the Saddarma of Buddhism:For example,the classic work Reply to the Arguments about Tantrayana in the Middle of Seventh Century(hereinafter referred to as the Refutation)contains 10 articles related to this debate.These colloquies mainly focused on the following three aspects:First,which classics were Tibetan translation works written by Indians,and which classics were the native works penned by Tibetans.Second,whatever was created by Tibetan people was a forgery,and any forgery was an evil Dharma,and any evil Dharma would never come to fruition.Third,whether the continuity of the old translation was the proper Dharma of Buddhism,whether the great perfection of Tantra is the proper Dharma of Buddhism,and whether the Theg-PadGu theory was the proper Dharma of Buddhism.Based on the above three aspects and related studies,this article concludes that Reply to the Arguments about Tantrayana in the Middle of the Seventh Century,was a rare and representative case of the summit dialogue in the process of realizing the localization of Tibetan Buddhism.In other words,Refutation has a has become quite famous in the Tibetan studies field,and its author is known as Luozhu Jiangze(1552-1624).The academic value of Refutation appears to be mainly manifested in the following three ways:First,from the perspective of the Nyingma School of Tibetan Buddhism,through his Refutation Luozhu Jangze systematically responded to the phenomenon of questioning whether the Nyingma’s Buddhism Classics belonged to the original Dharma of Buddhism.In fact,it was the summit dialogue between indigenous Tibetan Buddhists and foreign Indian Buddhists on the Tibetan Plateau.Second,Refutation included ten famous historical figures’ questioning works.Representing their own eras,these historical figures expressed their own views on the question of whether the Tantrayana in the middle of the seventh cen

关 键 词：前弘期密乘 大圆满 九乘学说 藏族本土化 

分 类 号：C95[社会学—民族学]