“辽宁本”真伪的史料学考辨  

A Textual Research on the Authenticity of“Liaoning ben”from the Perspective of Historical Data

作　　者：邓澧雨[1] 成臻铭[1] DENG Li-yu;CHENG Zhen-ming

机构地区：[1]吉首大学,湖南吉首416000

出　　处：《青海民族研究》2022年第4期29-36,共8页Qinghai Journal of Ethnology

基　　金：国家社科基金重大项目“中国土司制度通史(多卷本)”(批准号:18ZDA173);湖南省教育厅双一流学科重点项目“土司名称由来及其演变研究”(批准号:18A282);湖南省社科联课题“明清鼎革之际西南土司归附抉择问题研究”(批准号:XSP21YBC483)阶段性成果。

摘　　要：从史料来源的多元性、史料抄录的原始性和史料编纂的真实性三个维度对“辽宁本”进行了史料学的考辨,认为“辽宁本”是在特殊的时代背景下被夹带出宫的,其原有的史料誊录痕迹以及未经润色的史料编纂措辞体现了其原始性与真实性,表明该文本确系建文朝所修最初存于国史馆的《明太祖实录》原稿残本,史料价值弥足珍贵。From the three dimensions of the source of historical materials, the originality of historical material transcription, and the authenticity of historical material compilation, the“Liaoning ben” has been examined and identified in the science of historical materials.It was taken out of the Palace under the special background of the times. Its original historical material transcription traces and unpolished historical material compiling wording reflects its originality and authenticity, indicating that the text is indeed the original version of the Jianwen Dynasty. The manuscript fragment of Records of Ming Taizu kept in the National History Museum is very valuable as historical materials.

关 键 词：“辽宁本” 真伪 原始性 史料学 考辨 

分 类 号：C95[社会学—民族学]