近代知识分子对于“迷信”的反应——以方志文献为中心  

The Response of Modern Intellectuals to the"Superstition":Centering on Local Chronicles and Records

作　　者：宋露露 SONG Lu-lu(School of History and Archives,Yunnan University,Kunming Yunnan 650091)

机构地区：[1]云南大学历史与档案学院,云南昆明650091

出　　处：《巢湖学院学报》2022年第6期123-130,共8页Journal of Chaohu University

摘　　要：清末民初是国内新旧思想交锋的重要时期。值此之际“迷信”一词由日本传入,而后在文人界掀起讨论热潮。新式知识分子凭借敏锐的嗅觉,率先对“迷信”做出反应。由于新式观点的强势崛起,传统儒家知识分子的呼声日渐消亡。但通过对民国方志中“迷信”史料的梳理,发现“迷信”的传播过程并不是一蹴而就的,而是呈现出初期、中期、后期的多元化发展路径。这种复杂建构过程的揭示需要充分结合新旧知识分子观点,才能清楚了解传统语境下“迷信”的另类状态。现从“迷信”的指涉对象、新旧知识分子的融合与冲突以及“迷信”与“反迷信”之间产生斗争的诱因入手,用以探析传统视角下近代知识分子对“迷信”传播的真实反应。The end of Qing dynasty and the beginning of Republic of China is an important period of the conflict between new and old thoughts.In this context,the word Mixin("Superstition")was introduced from Japan,and then set off a wave of discussion in the literary world.The new intellectuals,with their keen observation,were the first to respond to"superstition".As a result of the rapid rise of new ideas,the voice of traditional Confucian intellectuals was dying out.However,by combing the historical materials about"superstition"in the local chronicles of the Republic of China,it is found that the spreading of"superstition"was not achieved overnight,but showed diversified development paths with the early,middle and late stages.The revelation of this complex construction process needs to fully combine with the old and new intellectuals′viewpoints in order for us to clearly understand the alternative state of"superstition"in the traditional context.Starting from the reference object of"superstition",the fusion and conflict between new and old intellectuals,and the causes of the conflict between"superstition"and"anti-superstition",the paper aims to explore the real response of modern intellectuals to the spread of"superstition"from the traditional perspective.

关 键 词：迷信 传统 方志 建构 

分 类 号：K25[历史地理—历史学]