欧盟国家援助审查背景下的ICSID裁决执行困境——以Micula案为例  

The Enforcement Dilemma of ICSID Verdict in the Context of EU State Aid Review——A Case Study of Micula

作　　者：刘俊梅 Liu Junmei(School of Law,Yili Normal University,Yining 835000,Xinjiang,China;Xinjiang Social Governance and Development Research Center,Yili Normal University,Yining 835000,Xinjiang,China;School of Law,Nanjing University,Nanjing 210093,Jiangsu,China)

机构地区：[1]伊犁师范大学法学院,新疆伊宁835000 [2]伊犁师范大学新疆社会治理与发展研究中心,新疆伊宁835000 [3]南京大学法学院,江苏南京210093

出　　处：《伊犁师范大学学报》2022年第4期45-51,共7页Journal of Yili Normal University

基　　金：2021年伊犁师范大学“一带一路”发展研究院开放课题“‘一带一路’沿线中亚国家投资便利化法律机制研究”(YDYL2021YB001)阶段性成果。

摘　　要：近期,瑞典投资者Micula等诉罗马尼亚案裁决在欧盟成员国执行时,受到了欧盟国家援助规则的干预,这是欧盟委员会首次将国家援助审查扩张适用到国际投资争端领域。通过比较两种不同的涉裁决执行的审查情形,欧盟成员国执行ICSID裁决,或将构成一种前所未有的非法“新”国家援助,从而无法在欧盟内部执行。在欧盟援助规则扩张性审查背景下,ICSID仲裁庭登记在审的83起同类案件的投资者及中国投资者,可向美国等非欧盟成员国的法院寻求法律救济途径,以应对投资过程中的援助审查风险。The recent decision in the case of Swedish investor Micula et al.v Romania was interfered with by EU state aid rules when implemented in EU member states.This is the first time that the Commission has extended state aid review to the field of international investment disputes.By comparing two different review situations involving the enforcement of an award,the implementation of an ICSID verdict by an EU Member State may constitute an unprecedented form of illegal "new" state aid that cannot be implemented within the EU.Under the background of the expansion review of EU aid rules,investors and Chinese investors in 83 similar cases registered by ICSID Tribunal can seek legal remedies from the courts of non-EU member states such as the United States to deal with the risk of aid review in the investment process.

关 键 词：欧盟国家援助规则 国际投资争端 执行裁决 Micula案 

分 类 号：D997.4[政治法律—国际法学]