检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:李国海[1] 张羽伦 Li Guohai;Zhang Yulun
机构地区:[1]中南大学法学院
出 处:《竞争政策研究》2023年第1期18-27,共10页Competition Policy Research
基 金:湖南省教育厅科学研究项目“涉标准必要专利的经营者集中之反垄断法规制研究”(19K102)的阶段性成果。
摘 要:标准必要专利作为行业标准与专利技术的结合,既具有行业统一标准的公共属性,又具有作为一般专利的私权属性。基于标准必要专利的特殊性,涉标准必要专利经营者集中更易产生单边效应和封锁效应,故反垄断执法机构在规制涉标准必要专利经营者集中行为时必须作特殊考量,采取适合的规制手段。近年来无论是我国还是欧盟和美国都更倾向于采取附加限制性条件的方式,以平衡各方利益。然我国反垄断机构在选择适用附加条件时存在局限性,表现在结构性条件适用频率低且知识产权规定范围不明确、FRAND规则适用不当、综合性条件适用过少等。未来应当加大结构性条件适用力度、细化行为性条件的适用、对于特殊案件优先选择适用综合性条件。As a combination of industry standard and patented technology,SEP not only has the public attribute of industry unified standard,but also has the private right attribute of general patent.Due to the particularity of SEPs,concentration of SEP undertakings is more likely to produce unilateral effects and blocking effects,so anti-monopoly law enforcement agencies must make special considerations and adopt appropriate regulatory measures when regulating the concentration of SEP undertakings.In recent years,both China and EU、USA have been more inclined to adopt restrictive conditions to balance the interests of all parties.However,China's anti-monopoly authorities have limitations in choosing to apply additional conditions,which are manifested in the low frequency of application of structural conditions,the unclear scope of intellectual property provisions,improper application of FRAND rules,and too little application of comprehensive conditions.In the future,we should increase the application of structural conditions,refi ne the application of behavioural conditions,and give priority to the application of comprehensive conditions in special cases.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.74