检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:李亚南 LI Yanan(Department of Law and Politics,Party School of C.P.C.Jiangsu Committee,Nanjing 210009,China)
机构地区:[1]中共江苏省委党校法政教研部,南京210009
出 处:《河北体育学院学报》2023年第2期24-30,共7页Journal of Hebei Sport University
摘 要:在数据时代背景下,反兴奋剂数据跨境转移已成为反兴奋剂领域的新趋势。世界反兴奋剂机构(WADA)进行数据跨境转移有利于全球范围内的反兴奋剂管制、教育、研究,符合公共利益的要求,具备合理性和合法性基础,但依然会对运动员个人数据权利和国家数据主权带来潜在风险。在《通用数据保护条例》语境下,WADA可以通过“在充分条件基础上的转移”和“遵守适当保障措施的转移”2种方式进行数据跨境转移,但鉴于二者存在的缺陷,还需要从EDPB数据跨境转移机制、最小范围原则、告知义务等方面对WADA数据跨境转移加以限制。我国应合理借鉴相关经验,推进反兴奋剂数据转移立法,完善反兴奋剂数据行业规范,加强反兴奋剂领域国际合作。In the context of the data age,cross-border transfer of anti-doping data has become a new trend in the field of anti-doping.The cross-border transfer of data by the World Anti-Doping Agency(WADA)is conducive to anti-doping control,education,and research worldwide,which meets the requirements of the public interest and has a basis for rationality and legitimacy,but it still poses potential risks to athletes’personal data rights and national data sovereignty.In the context of the General Data Protection Regulation(GDPR),WADA can conduct data cross-border transfer through two ways,including“transfer on the basis of sufficient conditions”and“transfer in compliance with appropriate safeguards”.However,in view of the shortcomings of the two ways,it is necessary to restrict the cross-border transfer of WADA data from the aspects of EDPB data cross-border transfer mechanism,principle of minimum scope and notification obligation.China should reasonably learn from relevant experience,promote anti-doping data transfer legislation,improve anti-doping data industry norms,and strengthen international cooperation in the field of anti-doping.
关 键 词:反兴奋剂 数据保护 数据跨境转移 GDPR WADC
分 类 号:G80-05[文化科学—运动人体科学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.7