“实”与“虚”:朝鲜王朝的“女史”——兼与中国古代“女史”比较  

Reality or Fiction:“Nvshi” in Joseon Dynasty——Also Compared with “Nvshi” in Ancient China

作　　者：张光宇 Zhang Guangyu

机构地区：[1]曲阜师范大学东北亚研究中心,日照276822

出　　处：《延边大学学报（社会科学版）》2023年第2期41-51,142,共12页Journal of Yanbian University：Social Science Edition

基　　金：国家社会科学基金项目(20CSS002)。

摘　　要：朝鲜王朝的“女史”作为职官并不见诸其官方典籍制度,但也随侍王后,参与一些宫中仪节,为王妃提供顾问,甚至为国王管理文书,实质上承担一定的宫中礼职和文职工作。虽然朝鲜君臣较为看重传统的“女史之法”在监戒宫闱、记功书过等方面的作用,新兴士林派大臣又有恢复设立“女史”作为史官的提议,但最终未能得以落实和施行。从具有“史学意义”到实则强调义理教化的“道德意义”,朝鲜的“女史彤管之法”于“虚实之间”,很可能成为了存在于女性“道德文章”中的一种特殊符号和话语形态。“Nvshi”(female officials)was not listed in the official rank system in Joseon Dynasty,however,they accompanied the queen,participated in some palace ceremonies,offered consultation for the queen,and even managed documents for the king,essentially assumed a certain number of ceremonial duties and civil work.Although the role of the traditional“system of Nvshi”in supervising harem and recording merits and faults was approved by the monarch and ministers of Joseon,the proposal of restoring “Nvshi”as the historiographer by the“Shilin”(intellectual circles)ministers was not finally implemented.From the“historical significance”to the“moral significance”,“the system of Nvshi Tongguan”“in reality or in fiction”was likely to be a special symbol and discourse existing in the female“moral essays”.

关 键 词：朝鲜王朝 “女史” “彤管” 女德 

分 类 号：D691[政治法律—政治学] D731.25[政治法律—中外政治制度] K312.34[历史地理—历史学] K22[历史地理—世界史]