马克思对蒲鲁东经济哲学思想的批判  

Marx’s Critique on Proudhon’s Economic Philosophy

作　　者：罗成翼 刘翠峰 LUO Chengyi;LIU Cuifeng(School of Marxism,University of South China,Hengyang,Hunan 421001;School of Marxism,Hunan First Normal University,Changsha,Hunan 410205)

机构地区：[1]南华大学马克思主义学院,湖南衡阳421001 [2]湖南第一师范学院马克思主义学院,湖南长沙410000

出　　处：《湖南第一师范学院学报》2023年第1期45-51,共7页Journal of Hunan First Normal University

基　　金：2022年度湖南省研究生科研创新项目“马克思对蒲鲁东唯心史观的批判研究”(CX20221033)。

摘　　要：19世纪40年代,国际共产主义运动受到以蒲鲁东主义为代表的改良主义思潮的干扰。蒲鲁东在《贫困的哲学》中,把自己的经济哲学思想当成一种“科学的发现”,并提出这种思想蕴含的方法论是一种“历史的叙述的方法”,其负面影响甚嚣尘上,对国际共产主义运动造成了巨大破坏。为了减少这种破坏性影响并能促进国际工人运动积极发展,马克思在《哲学的贫困》中,揭示了蒲鲁东经济哲学思想的唯心史观立论基础及其所谓的“系列”辩证法,并对其核心理论即价值理论和所有权理论展开有力批判。针对蒲鲁东对经济问题哲学化的荒谬构想,马克思深入历史本质的维度,将人类社会发展的历史轨迹呈现出来,既指明了全人类解放的实现路径,又为社会科学研究提供了全新思路。In the 1840s,the international communist movement was disturbed by the reformist trend of thought represented by Proudonism.When Proudhon regarded his economic philosophy thought as a“scientific discovery”in his The Philosophy of Poverty,and proposed that the methodology contained in this thought was a“historical narrative method”,this negative influence was even more rampant and caused great damage to the international communist movement.In order to reduce this destructive influence and promote the positive development of the international workers’movement,Marx,in The Poverty of Philosophy,revealed the idealistic historical basis of Proudhon’s economic philosophy,explored its methodology,and strongly criticized its core theories,namely,value theory and ownership theory.Getting rid of Proudhon’s beautiful illusion of philosophizing economic issues,Marx went deep into the dimension of historical essence and presented the historical track of human social development,which not only pointed out the path to achieve the liberation of all mankind,but also provided a new idea for social science research.

关 键 词：马克思 《哲学的贫困》 蒲鲁东 历史唯物主义 经济哲学 

分 类 号：B03[哲学宗教—哲学理论]