受贿犯罪中“为他人谋取利益”要件的坚守与认定  

Persistence and Recognition of "Seeking Benefits for Others" in Bribery Crime

作　　者：陈可蕊 Chen Kerui(East China University of Political Science and Law,Shanghai 200042,China)

机构地区：[1]华东政法大学刑事法学院,上海200042

出　　处：《湖南警察学院学报》2022年第6期103-110,共8页Journal of Hunan Police Academy

摘　　要：从受贿犯罪的本质属性来看,如果认为“钱权交易”即“职务行为与财物”之间的对价关系,则“为他人谋取利益”的要件必须存在。从“为他人谋取利益”要件的存在机能来看,其在“感情投资”与“事后受贿”的情形当中可以作为判断罪与非罪的标准。此外,关于“为他人谋取利益”要件属性的争议,根据2016年的司法解释,主观说相对而言更为合理。面对“为他人谋取利益”在司法实践中难以认定的问题,首先,司法解释中的“明知具体请托事项”与“可能影响职权行使”可以视为“为他人谋取利益”的认定标准,但是还应当对其作出进一步的解释。其次,“不正当利益”的界定也有诸多争议,对此应当从行贿方和受贿方综合判断,区分实体正义与程序正义。Judging from the essential nature of the crime of accepting bribes, if "money rights trading" is regarded as the consideration relationship between "official acts and property", the element of "seeking benefits for others" must exist. From the perspective of the existence function of the element mentioned above, it can be used as a criterion for convicting guilt and non-crime in the case of "emotional investment" and "bribery after the fact". In addition, the controversy over the nature of the element of "seeking benefits for others" is relatively more reasonable according to the judicial interpretation in 2016. Facing the problem that "seeking benefits for others" is difficult to determine in judicial practice, first of all, "knowing the specific matters to be entrusted" and "likely to affect the exercise of authority" in the judicial interpretation can be regarded as the criteria for determining "seeking benefits for others", but further interpretations should be made on them. Secondly, there are many controversies over the definition of "improper interests", which should be comprehensively judged from the briber and the receiver to distinguish between substantive justice and procedural justice.

关 键 词：受贿犯罪 保护法益 钱权交易 

分 类 号：D914[政治法律—刑法学]