检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:张翔宇 李小波 ZHANG Xiangyu;LI Xiaobo(People's Public Security University of China,Beijing 100038,China)
机构地区:[1]中国人民公安大学首都社会安全研究基地,北京100038 [2]中国人民公安大学治安学院,北京100038
出 处:《河南警察学院学报》2022年第5期13-22,共10页Journal of Henan Police College
基 金:国家社科基金重大项目“数字时代总体国家安全观的理论深化与实践逻辑研究”(22ZDA120)的阶段性研究成果。
摘 要:在推进国家治理体系和治理能力现代化背景下,作为社会治理基本单元和重要场域的社区治安治理面临着现代化的时代命题,因而构建多元主体协同效能的“社区治安治理共同体”成为优化城市社区治安治理的“可行解”。济南市社区治安协同治理实践是构建社区治安治理共同体的积极探索,结合协同治理理论与“共同体”治理思想,以SFIC模型为分析框架,剖析济南市的实践探索所取得成效及存在的阻滞,并在此基础上从夯实起始条件、强化催化领导、完善制度设计、改良协同过程、优化结果输出五个方面提出社区治安治理共同体构建的实践路径。In the context of promoting the modernization of national governance system and capacity, community security governance, as the basic unit and important field of social governance, is facing the proposition of modernization. In this regard, trying to build a “community public security governance community” that exerts the synergistic effect of multiple subjects has become a feasible solution to optimize urban community public security governance. The practice of collaborative governance of community security in Jinan is an active exploration of building a community of community security governance. This study combines the theory of collaborative governance with the idea of “community” governance and takes the SFIC model as the analytical framework to analyze the achievements and existing problems of the practical exploration in Jinan. On this basis, the practice path of community security governance community construction is proposed from five aspects: consolidating initial conditions, strengthening catalytic leadership, improving system design, improving collaborative process, and optimizing result output.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28