检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:王国华[1] Wang Guohua
机构地区:[1]大连海洋大学外国语与国际教育学院,辽宁大连116023
出 处:《台湾研究集刊》2023年第1期87-103,共17页Taiwan Research Journal
基 金:2017年度教育部人文社会科学基金一般项目“基于我国海洋权益视角的日本海洋渔业扩张政策研究——1868-1955”(17YJAZH079);辽宁省教育厅项目“近代日本在东亚的殖民主义海洋渔业政策研究”(JW202003)。
摘 要:日本殖民统治中国台湾和朝鲜半岛期间,移植国内渔业法制,在上述两地设置水产试验科研机构、成立渔业或水产组合,通过完善制度和政策建设,在短时期内使两地的渔业法制实现了近代化,推动了海洋渔业走向规范化和秩序化。但这种近代化是基于对殖民地人民的掠夺之上的,目的是满足殖民统治和资源掠夺的需要。渔业法律政策为殖民统治披上制度的外衣,先天带有殖民属性。日本殖民者借助法律政策在东亚渔业领域主导规则建立,构建特权甚至是霸权秩序,也为日本构建“海上帝国”以及在东亚地区的殖民起到后援支撑作用。During its colonial rule of the Korean Peninsula and Taiwan of China, Japan transplanted its domestic fishery legal system, set up aquatic research institutions, and established fishery or aquatic associations in the two colonies. Through the institutional improvement and policy construction, the fishery legal system in both places was modernized in a short period of time, which promoted the standardization and regularization of marine fisheries. However, this modernization was based on the plunder of the people of Taiwan region and Korea, and the motivation was to meet the needs of colonial rule and resource exploitation. The related laws and policies served as a means of institutionalizing colonial rule, characterized by their inherently colonial nature. Colonial Japan used legal policies to create rules, secure privileges, and build a hegemonic order in the East Asian fisheries sphere, while also providing support for the establishment of a “maritime empire” and for colonial expansion in East Asia.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:13.59.172.7