检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:张自强 何婕 周伟[3] ZHANG Ziqiang;HE Jie;ZHOU Wei(School of Economics,Guizhou University,Guiyang 550025,China;College of Tourism and Culture Industry,Guizhou University,Guiyang 550025,China;College of Economics and Management,South China Agricultural University,Guangzhou 510642,China)
机构地区:[1]贵州大学经济学院,贵阳550025 [2]贵州大学旅游与文化产业学院,贵阳550025 [3]华南农业大学经济管理学院,广州510642
出 处:《林业经济问题》2022年第6期589-598,共10页Issues of Forestry Economics
基 金:教育部人文社会科学研究项目(21XJC790015);国家自然科学基金青年项目(72003069)。
摘 要:基于前景理论分析了生态文明建设背景下农户公益林规模对商品林种植结构的影响机制,着重考察了农户非农就业对公益林规模影响商品林种植结构的约束作用,并利用国家林业和草原局集体林权制度改革监测数据进行实证检验。结果表明:农户林地经营面积中公益林比例对商品林林地面积中用材林比例和经济林比例分别具有显著的负向与正向影响;家庭收入主要依靠外出务工的农户,公益林比例对用材林比例的负向影响会减弱,农户非农就业比例越高,公益林比例对经济林比例的正向影响被弱化的程度越大;公益林建设强化了农户对采伐指标申请难度的感知,促使农户将用材林转种经济林以规避未来被划为公益林后的禁伐损失。因此,需要合理规划公益林片区,优化经营管制措施,提升公益林管护水平与用材林林分质量。⑴Background——After China completely implemented the policy of stopping commercial logging of natural forests,the external dependence of wood in China has been increasing.The continuous expansion of the construction scale of public welfare forests may change the farmers'planting structure of commercial forests,which has a significant impact on both national timber supply security and ecological security.⑵Methods——Based on the prospect theory of behavioral economics,this paper analyzed the impact mechanism of the scale of the farmers'public welfare forests on the planting structure of commercial forests from the perspective of loss aversion,focused on the constraint effects of the farmers'non-agricultural employment on the impact mechanism,and put forward the research hypotheses.The Tobit model was used to empirically test the research hypotheses based on the monitoring data of collective forest rights system reform of the National Forestry and Grassland Administration in 2016.⑶Results——First,the proportion of public welfare forests had a significant negative effect on the proportion of timber forests,while it had a significant positive effect on the proportion of economic forests,and the effect was greater.The reasons were as follows:on one hand,the construction of public welfare forests strengthened the control of forest and wood logging and reduced the enthusiasm of farmers to plant timber forests.On the other hand,the ecological compensation of public welfare forest could not make up for the loss caused by the restriction of forestland management rights,and the farmers may convert the timber forests into the less restricted economic forests.Second,the interaction term between the source of family income and the proportion of public welfare forests had a significant positive effect on the proportion of timber forests.The interaction term between the proportion of non-agricultural employment and the proportion of public welfare forests had a significant negative effect on the proportion of econo
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.38