检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:蔡禾[1] 徐金福 CAI He;XU Jin-fu
机构地区:[1]中山大学社会学与人类学学院,广东广州510275
出 处:《中南民族大学学报(人文社会科学版)》2023年第2期80-90,184,185,共13页Journal of South-Central Minzu University (Humanities and Social Sciences)
基 金:国家社会科学基金重大项目“残疾人社会组织活力的社会机制研究”(21&ZD182)。
摘 要:社区治理绩效高低是国家治理体系和治理能力现代化的体现。基于中国劳动力动态调查(CLDS)2018数据分析发现,我国城市社区治理绩效总体处在中等偏上水平,但治理绩效在社区之间存在较大差异。社区治理绩效主要受到社区社会结构、社区社会资本、社区组织资源的影响,这些影响因素在可视性和非可视性社区治理绩效上存在明显差异。研究发现,社区社会结构对社区治理绩效的客观影响会受到社区治理行动主体的调节,同时我国城市社区并没有呈现出西方社会发现的社区分层地位与社区治理绩效之间的显著关系。Community governance performance is the embodiment of the modernization of national governance system and governance ability.Based on the data of China Labor Dynamics Survey(CLDS)2018,it is found that the overall governance performance of Chinese urban communities is above the average level,but there are great differences in governance performance among various communities.Community governance performance is mainly affected by community social structure,community social capital and community organizational resources,for which there are obvious differences between visible and non-visible community governance performance.It is found that the objective influence of community social structure on community governance performance will be moderated by community governance actions.At the same time,Chinese urban communities do not show a significant relationship between community stratification status and community governance performance as found in western societies.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.15.204.106