港口经营人在海上货物运输法中的地位  

The Status of Port Operators in the Law on the Carriage of Goods by Sea

作　　者：周耕墨 ZHOU Gengmo(Dalian Maritime University,Dalian 116026,China)

机构地区：[1]大连海事大学,辽宁大连116026

出　　处：《物流科技》2022年第18期88-91,共4页Logistics Sci-Tech

摘　　要：文章对接受承运人委托的港口经营人在海上货物运输法中的法律地位进行探讨,基于对海上货物运输合同的分析,我国学者提出了将其认定为承运人的受雇人、承运人的代理人、实际承运人和独立合同人的观点。海运履约方作为一种新概念在《鹿特丹规则》中被提出,并对与海运相关的法律产生了重要的影响。因其委托方的不同港口经营人在《中华人民共和国海商法》修改送审稿中被划分出来,接受船方委托的港口经营人被认定为实际承运人,而接受货方委托的港口经营人则被赋予援引“喜马拉雅条款”的权利,这种方案有一定的可取之处,也依然存在一定的局限性。In this paper,the legal status of the port operator entrusted by the carrier in the law of the carriage of goods by sea is discussed.Based on the analysis of contnacts for the carriage of goods by sea,Chinese scholars have put forward the point of identifying the port operator as the servant of the carrier,the agent of the carrier,the actual carrier and the independent contractor.Maritime performance party,as a new concept,was put forward in Rotterdam Rules,which has an important impact on the law related to maritime transportation.The port operator is divided in the revised draft of the Maritime Law due to the differences of the principal parties.The port operator who accepts the authorization of the ship is identified as the actual carrier,while the port operator who accepts the authorization of the cargo party is given the right to invoke the Himalayan provisions.This scheme has some advantages,but it still has some limitations.

关 键 词：港口经营人 海运履约方 实际承运人 海商法 承运人的代理人 

分 类 号：F923.99[经济管理]