检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:刘欣[1] 胡安宁[1] Liu Xin;Hu Anning
机构地区:[1]复旦大学社会学系
出 处:《社会学研究》2023年第1期1-21,共21页Sociological Studies
基 金:中宣部文化名家暨“四个一批”人才自主选题项目“中国转型社会的社会分层与流动”的阶段性研究成果。
摘 要:共同富裕无悖于微观正义,才能激发效率,使个体获得符合微观正义原则的应得预期进而提升幸福感;共同富裕体现宏观正义,才能保障普惠福祉,在宏观层次上降低生活不确定性感知进而提升幸福感。本研究通过分析CGSS2010资料发现,微观公平感与微观正义原则认知显著相关,但与最小化收入差距规则认知无关;宏观公平感与最小化收入差距规则认知显著相关,却与微观正义原则认知无关。宏观公平感和微观公平感均与平均主义原则认知负相关,二者能独立提升幸福感且效应可加。Common prosperity is not contrary to micro justice,which can stimulate efficiency and enhance happiness by enabling individuals to obtain deserved expectations in accordance with micro justice principles.Common prosperity embodies macro-justice,which can guarantee universal well-being and enhance happiness by reducing the perception of life uncertainty at the macro level.Analyzing the CGSS2010 data,it is found that perception of micro-fairness is significantly related to the cognition of micro-justice principle but not to the cognition of minimizing income disparity rule;perception of macro-faimness is significantly related to the cognition of minimizing income disparity rule but not to the cognition of micro-justice principle.Both perception of macro-fairness and micro-fainess were negatively related to the cognition of egalitarian principle,and both of them could independently enhance happiness with additive effects.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15