检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:莫秋鹃 薛洁 唐佳佳 Mo Qiu-juan;Xue Jie;Tang Jia-jia(Department of Cardiology,Nanjing First Hospital,Nanjing Medical University,Nanjing 210006,Jiangsu Province,China)
机构地区:[1]南京医科大学附属南京医院(南京市第一医院)心内科,江苏南京210006
出 处:《中国社区医师》2023年第4期117-120,共4页Chinese Community Doctors
摘 要:目的:探讨同感心心理沟通干预对慢性心力衰竭患者的影响。方法:选取2021年1-9月南京医科大学附属南京医院收治的46例慢性心力衰竭患者作为对照组,选取2021年10月-2022年6月南京医科大学附属南京医院收治的47例慢性心力衰竭患者作为观察组。对照组给予常规护理干预,观察组在对照组基础上给予同感心心理沟通干预。比较两组干预前后焦虑、抑郁情绪情况,自我感受负担评分,生活质量评分。结果:干预前,两组焦虑自评量表(SAS)、抑郁自评量表(SDS)评分比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);干预后,两组SAS、SDS评分低于干预前,且观察组低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。干预前,两组情感负担、经济负担、身体负担、自我感受负担量表(SPBS)总分比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);干预后,两组情感负担、经济负担、身体负担、SPBS总分低于干预前,且观察组低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。干预前,两组心理功能、躯体功能、社会功能、物质功能、生活质量综合评定问卷(GQOLI-74)总分比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);干预后,两组心理功能、躯体功能、社会功能、物质功能、GQOLI-74总分高于干预前,且观察组高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:同感心心理沟通干预能缓解慢性心力衰竭患者负性情绪,减轻自我感受负担,提高生活质量。Objective:To explore the effect of empathy psychological communication intervention in patients with chronic heart failure.Methods:A total of 46 patients with chronic heart failure admitted to Nanjing First Hospital,Nanjing Medical University from January 2021 to September 2021 were selected as control group,and 47 patients with chronic heart failure admitted to Nanjing First Hospital,Nanjing Medical University from October 2021 to June 2022 were selected as observation group.The control group was given routine nursing intervention,and the observation group was given empathy psychological communication intervention on the basis of control group.The anxiety and depression,self-perceived burden score and quality of life score before and after intervention were compared between two groups.Results:Before the intervention,there was no significant difference in the scores of Self-rating Anxiety Scale(SAS)and the Self-rating Depression Scale(SDS)between the two groups(P>0.05).After the intervention,the SAS and SDS scores in the two groups were lower than those before the intervention,and the observation group was lower than the control group,and the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).Before the intervention,there were no significant differences in the emotional burden,economic burden,physical burden and self-perceived burden scale(SPBS)total scores between the two groups(P>0.05).After the intervention,the emotional burden,economic burden,physical burden and SPBS total scores in the two groups were lower than those before the intervention,and the observation group was lower than the control group,and the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).Before the intervention,there were no significant differences in the psychological function,physical function,social function,material function and Generic Quality of Life Inventory 74(GQOLI-74)total scores between the two groups(P>0.05).After the intervention,the psychological function,physical function,social function,material function,and GQOLI-74 total sc
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.249