恩格斯“历史合力论”的原初语境及其批判意蕴——兼驳阿尔都塞对恩格斯“历史合力论”的误读  

The Original Context and Critical Implication of Engels’ "Historical Resultant Theory"——Also Refuting Althusser’s Misreading of Engels’ " Historical Resultant Theory"

作　　者：韩志伟[1] 陈洁彤 HAN Zhi-wei;CHEN Jie-tong(School of Philosophy and Sociology&Study Center of Philosophy Basic Theory,Jilin University,Changchun 130012,China)

机构地区：[1]吉林大学哲学基础理论研究中心暨哲学社会学院,长春130012

出　　处：《理论探讨》2023年第2期132-139,共8页Theoretical Investigation

基　　金：教育部人文社会科学基地重大项目“人类文明新形态和文化发展理念的哲学创新”(18JJD720001)。

摘　　要：从单个意志的角度出发,阿尔都塞认为,恩格斯的“历史合力论”立足原子式的个人,为人们提供了一个关于意志的空洞的推理公式,展现出一种“认识论真空”,因而是资产阶级意识形态。恩格斯实际上是在要素与整体的关系意义上阐发单个意志及其合力的辩证关系的。“历史合力论”紧紧地依托资产阶级社会生产的无政府状态,并不是空洞的推论公式。通过对社会生产的无政府状态的考察,“历史合力论”深刻地揭示了资产阶级社会所具有的内在矛盾,进而阐明历史发展的客观规律,从而彰显其所具有的批判意蕴。From the point of view of the individual will, Althusser argues that Engels’ theory of historical resultant force is based on the atomic individual, providing people with an empty formula of reasoning about the will, showing an "epistemological vacuum" and thus a bourgeois ideology. But in fact, Engels elaborated the dialectical relationship between the individual will and its resultant force in the sense of the relationship between the elements and the whole. Moreover, the elaboration of the theory of historical resultant force is closely based on the anarchy of social production in bourgeois society, which is not an empty formula for inference. Through the investigation of the anarchy of social production, the theory of historical resultant force profoundly reveals the inherent contradictions of bourgeois society, and then elucidates the objective laws of historical development, thus showing its critical implications.

关 键 词：“历史合力论” 意识形态 历史规律 

分 类 号：A811[哲学宗教—马克思主义哲学]