基于层次分析法的《建筑法》立法后评估指标体系构建  

Establishment of Post-legislative Evaluation Index System of Construction Law Based on Analytic Hierarchy Process

作　　者：王丹[1] 马世昌 WANG Dan;MA Shichang(School of Urban Economics and Management,Beijing University of Civil Engineering and Architecture,Beijing 100044)

机构地区：[1]北京建筑大学城市经济与管理学院,北京100044

出　　处：《北京建筑大学学报》2022年第6期96-102,共7页Journal of Beijing University of Civil Engineering and Architecture

基　　金：北京市社会科学基金项目(19FXC017)。

摘　　要：立法后评估的难点之一在于构建具有一定普适性的评价指标体系,特别是在确定评估指标之后,如何科学合理地设定各评估指标的权重是关键问题之一。以《建筑法》的立法后评估为例,确定合法性、合理性、可操作性、效益性和技术性5个一级指标和15个二级指标,在此基础上,根据层次分析法设定立法后评估指标的权重,并通过设计、发放、回收、统计评估调查问卷,对于已建立的指标体系进行信度分析和结果检验。以上立法后评估指标体系设定路径可以有效避免主观随意性,成为《建筑法》立法后评估的重要依据,也可以为其他法律法规的后评估工作提供参考。One of the difficulties in post-legislative evaluation lies in the construction of certain universal evaluation index system, especially after the evaluation indicators are determined, and how to scientifically and reasonably set the weight of each evaluation index is one of the key issues. Taking the Construction Law as an example, firstly, the five first-class indicators and fifteen second-class indicators are determined. Secondly, the weight of each indicators is set according to analytic hierarchy process. Thirdly, the questionnaire is designed, distributed, recovered and statistically evaluated in order to test the reliability of the established index system. The evaluation index system can effectively avoid subjective arbitrariness, and serve as the basic reference for post-legislative evaluation of various laws and regulations.

关 键 词：建筑法 立法后评估 指标体系 层次分析法 

分 类 号：DF31[政治法律—宪法学与行政法学]