检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:宋秀军 王书军[2] 尹彦罡[2] SONG Xiujun;WANG Shujun;YIN Yangang(School of Economics,Dongbei University of Finance and Economics,Dalian 116025,China;School of Business,Hebei University of Economics and Business,Shijiazhuang 050061,China)
机构地区:[1]东北财经大学经济学院,辽宁大连116025 [2]河北经贸大学商学院,河北石家庄050061
出 处:《经济与管理》2023年第2期41-48,共8页Economy and Management
基 金:国家社会科学基金重点项目(17AKS001)。
摘 要:充分就业作为我国宏观经济政策的重要目标一直广受关注。基于我国就业优先实践经验构建政府介入劳动市场和就业干预情景下的工资增长模型,运用1980-2019年社会保障和就业数据对该模型进行实证分析。研究结果表明:政府积极就业干预政策在经济增长率较高的情况下对工资增长产生显著影响,而在经济增长率较低的情况下不会对工资增长产生显著影响;只有同时综合考虑货币工资增长率、通货膨胀率和就业干预力量,才能判断货币工资的增加是否真正代表了现实中实际工资的增加。平衡的宏观经济政策可能更有利于保持工资性收入的持续增长,进而有利于提高劳动报酬在初次分配中的比重和实现共同富裕。As an important goal of China’s macroeconomic policy,full employment has been widely concerned.Based on the practical experience of employment priority in China,the wage growth model under the situation of government intervention in the labor market and employment intervention is constructed,and the model is empirically analyzed using the social security and employment data from 1980 to 2019.The results show that the government’s active employment intervention policy will have a significant impact on wage growth when the economic growth rate is high,but will not have a significant impact on wage growth when the economic growth rate is low;Only by considering the growth rate of monetary wages,inflation rate and employment intervention force can we judge whether the increase of monetary wages represents the increase of real wages in reality.A balanced macroeconomic policy may be more conducive to maintaining the continuous growth of wage income and then increasing the proportion of labor remuneration in the initial distribution and achieving common prosperity.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.217.35.130