检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:袁荣华[1] 于晓强 王春战 夏春秋[2] 仲崇俊[2] 黄海涛 YUAN Ronghua;YU Xiaoqiang;WANG Chunzhan;XIA Chunqiu;ZHONG Chongjun;HUANG Haitao(Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery,Nantong First People’s Hospital,Nantong University Second Affiliated Hospital,Nantong 226001,Jiangsu,China;Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery,Nantong First People’s Hospital,Nantong University Second Affiliated Hospital,Nantong 226001,Jiangsu,China)
机构地区:[1]南通大学附属第二医院,南通市第一人民医院胃肠外科,江苏南通226001 [2]南通大学附属第二医院,南通市第一人民医院胸心血管外科,江苏南通226001
出 处:《外科研究与新技术》2022年第4期227-231,共5页Surgical Research and New Technique
摘 要:目的 比较研究经腹及经胸两种不同术式治疗贲门癌的临床结果。方法 选取2014年1月—2017年12月收治的贲门癌患者198例,以手术方式不同分为研究组(经腹贲门癌切除者)108例和对照组(经左胸贲门癌切除者)90例。统计两组患者的一般临床资料,分析比较两组患者手术时间、术中及术后出血量、术后并发症、淋巴结清扫率,切缘的阳性率,TNM(Tumor Node Metastasis)临床分期、住院死亡率、平均住院时间,术后5年随访结果等。结果 两组患者临床一般资料比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。研究组在手术时间、术中及术后出血量、术后并发症、淋巴结清扫率,平均住院时间方面优于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。研究组在切缘的阳性率与对照组相当,两组均能达到完整切除,两组5年生存率统计学未见明显差异(P>0.05)。结论 经胸贲门癌根治术虽然能够增加食管下段切除的长度、清扫纵膈淋巴结,但该术式术后并发症发生率高,手术创伤较大,术后5年生存率改善不明显,因此经腹手术推荐应用于本组贲门癌患者。Objective To compare the clinical outcomes of patients with cardiac cancer undergoing radical resection by laparotomy or thoracotomy. Methods A total of 198 patients with cardiac cancer were selected from January 2014 to December 2017. Among them, 108 patients in the study group received trans-abdominal cancer resection and 90 patients in the control group received trans-thoracic cancer resection. General clinical characteristics, surgery time, intraoperative and postoperative hemorrhage volumes, postoperative complications, lymph nodes resection rate, positive surgical margins, tumor node metastasis(TNM) stages, hospital mortality rate, hospital stay, and 5-year survival were compared between the two groups. Results No significant difference was found in general clinical characteristics(P>0.05). Compared with the control group, the surgery time, intraoperative and postoperative hemorrhage volumes, postoperative complication rate, lymph nodes resection rate, and hospital stay were superior in the study group(P<0.05). No difference in positive surgical margin rate was found between the two groups, both with complete resection. There was no significant difference in 5-year survival rate between the two groups(P>0.05).Conclusion Complications more frequently happen, operative trauma is larger, and 5-year survival is not increased after trans-thoracic cardiac cancer resection, though more esophagus and mediastinal lymph nodes can be removed.Therefore, trans-abdominal cardiac cancer resection is recommended.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.222.110.185