检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:胡雪冰 Hu Xuebing(Fuzhou University,Fujian Fuzhou 350007)
机构地区:[1]福州大学,福建福州350007
出 处:《安徽警官职业学院学报》2022年第6期16-22,33,共8页Journal of Anhui Vocational College of Police Officers
摘 要:近年来关于虐待动物,食用动物问题引发较多争议,民众也呼吁尽快制定相关的动物保护法,但立法是一项事关国民权利义务调整的重大事项,需慎之又慎。动物保护是否应当立法可从法经济学角度进行分析,可运用成本—收益论证在适当限度内将非野生动物保护立法能实现社会效用最大化,运用博弈理论论证国家在立法过程中所应采取的博弈策略,在此基础上借用两大理论探讨我国非野生动物保护立法问题。In recent years,the issue of animal cruelty and eating animals has caused a lot of controversy,and the public has also called for the enactment of relevant animal protection laws as soon as possible. However,legislation is a major matter concerning the adjustment of national rights and obligations,which is imperative not to be careless. The paper intends to analyze whether animal protection should be legislated from the perspective of law and economics. The method of cost-benefit analysis demonstrates that the social utility can be maximized by legislating animal protection by reasonable means. What’s more,the use of game theory demonstrates that the state should establish an appropriate communication mechanism in the legislative process. On this basis,the enlightenment of utility maximization theory and game theory to legislative activities are summarized,in order to benefit the issue of animal protection legislation in China.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117