侵犯公民个人信息罪的法益确证——兼及复合法益说之提倡  

The Corroboration of Legal Interest in the Crime of Infringing Citizens’Personal Information——The Advocacy of Compound Legal Interest

作　　者：余鑫扬 Yu Xinyang(China University of Political Science and Law,Beijing 100088)

机构地区：[1]中国政法大学刑事司法学院,北京100088

出　　处：《安徽警官职业学院学报》2022年第6期51-57,共7页Journal of Anhui Vocational College of Police Officers

摘　　要：对于侵犯公民个人信息罪的法益确证,理论界存在个人法益观与超个人法益观两条对立路径。超个人法益观将侵犯公民个人信息罪的法益界定为公共利益,与个人信息的权利属性存在抵牾,本罪法益应当在个人法益观的视域下予以探讨。复合法益说以信息自决权作为侵犯公民个人信息罪的主要保护法益,将公共信息安全作为衍生法益,在必要时,对信息自决权予以适当限制。只有通过复合法益说的指引,才能真正为本罪争讼问题提供合理答案,正确划定本罪的犯罪圈。There are two opposing paths for the legal interest confirmation of the crime of infringing citi⁃zens'personal information:individual legal interest view and superindividual legal interest view.The con⁃cept of superindividual legal interest defines the legal interest of the crime of infringing citizens'personal information as public interest,which is inconsistent with the right attribute of personal information.The le⁃gal interest of this crime should be discussed from the perspective of the concept of individual legal inter⁃est.The theory of compound legal interest regards the right to information self-determination as the main protection interest of the crime of infringing citizens'personal information,and the security of public in⁃formation as the derived legal interest.When necessary,the right to information self-determination should be appropriately restricted.Only through the guidance of the theory of compound legal interest can really provide reasonable answers to the problems of this crime and correctly delineate the crime circle of this crime.

关 键 词：信息自决权 人格权利 公共信息安全 复合法益说 

分 类 号：D924.3[政治法律—刑法学]