秦代以降民族纠纷解决制度及其历史教益  

Ethnic Dispute Resolution System and Its Historical Teachings since Qin Dynasty

作　　者：周进 黄孝慧 ZHOU Jin;HUANG Xiao-hui(Law School,Yunnan University,Kunming,Yunnan 650000,China;The College of Humanities&Science of Guizhou Minzu Universty,Guiyang,Guizhou 550025,China)

机构地区：[1]云南大学法学院,云南昆明650000 [2]贵阳人文科技学院,贵州贵阳550025

出　　处：《贵州民族研究》2023年第1期83-90,共8页Guizhou Ethnic Studies

基　　金：贵州省2021年度哲学社会科学规划国学单列课题青年课题“民国以来贵州的乡村治理研究”(批号:21GZGX30)的阶段性成果。

摘　　要：中国自古族裔众多,绵延数千年的民族史累积了丰富的族际纠纷处置之道。从秦汉“羁縻之策”的高度自治到明清“改土归流”的政制常规化,随着专制体制的强化,历代对民族地方的控制趋向于直接和细密,纠纷解决的制度也从“因俗而治”的习惯规则主导过渡到愈益深入的国家法适用之上。作为史鉴,欲妥善化解民族纷争,应贯彻民族平等、尊重民族差异、协调国家法与民族习惯规则等原则。China has many ethnic groups since ancient times, and several thousand years of ethnic history have accumulated abundant ways of dealing with ethnic disputes. From the high autonomy of Jimi policy(governed indirectly and placidly) in Qin and Han dynasties to the political system routinization of Gaituguiliu(bureaucratization of native chieftain)in Ming and Qing dynasties, with the strengthening of autocratic system, the control over ethnic areas in successive dynasties tended to be direct and meticulous, and the dispute settlement also transited from the customary law dominance of “rule by custom”to the more and more thorough application of state law. As a historical reference, in order to resolve ethnic disputes properly, we should implement the principles of ethnic equality, respect for ethnic differences and coordination between state laws and ethnic customary laws.

关 键 词：民族 羁縻之治 纠纷解决 民族习惯规则 

分 类 号：D633[政治法律—政治学]