埃森心理健康资源评估量表的汉化与信效度检验  

Chinese Version of Essener Resources Inventory and Its Reliability and Validity Test

作　　者：余萍 熊玉倩 周晓艺[4] 王刚 Sefik Tagay Wolfgang Senf 施琪嘉[1,2] YU Ping(Wuhan Mental Health Center,Wuhan,Hubei,430022,China)

机构地区：[1]武汉市精神卫生中心,湖北武汉430022 [2]武汉市心理医院,湖北武汉430022 [3]武汉忠德心理医院,湖北武汉430013 [4]湖北省肿瘤医院放疗科,湖北武汉430079 [5]杜伊斯堡埃森大学心身医学与心理治疗系,德国埃森45133

出　　处：《医学与社会》2023年第3期72-77,共6页Medicine and Society

基　　金：国家重点研发计划,编号为2018YFC1314303;武汉市中青年医学骨干人才培养计划基金项目。

摘　　要：目的:引进Tagay等编制的埃森心理健康资源评估量表(Essener resources inventory, ERI),在中国人群样本中进行中文版修订和信效度检验。方法:在1157名被试中进行施测,通过探索性因子分析和验证性因子分析等方法,对量表的结构效度、实证效度和信度进行了检验,并通过比较不同分组、年龄的资源水平差异检验量表的区分效度。结果:ERI的三因子结构(个人资源、社会资源和结构性资源)模型拟合较好。ERI及各因子得分与效标量表得分的相关系数均有统计学意义(P<0.05);不同年龄组的ERI及各因子得分差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05),其中60岁以上的老年群体得分明显低于其他年龄组被试;患病组被试ERI量表得分显著低于正常组。总量表的内部一致性信度为0.93,分半信度为0.90,两周重测信度为0.60;各因子的内部一致性信度为0.41-0.91,分半信度为0.41-0.86,各因子两周重测信度为0.34-0.57。结论:ERI中文版具有较高的信效度,可以用来测量中国人群的心理健康资源水平。Objective: To introduce the Essener resources inventory(ERI) compiled by Tagay et al, and to revise the Chinese version and test its reliability and validity in Chinese population samples. Methods: The test was conducted among 1157 subjects. The structural validity, criterion validity and reliability of the scale were tested by exploratory factor analysis and confirmatory factor analysis. In addition, the discriminant validity of the scale was tested by comparing the resource level differences of different groups and ages. Results: The model of three-factor structure of ERI(personal resources, social resources and structural resources) fitted well. The correlation coefficients between ERI and the scores of each factor and the scores of the efficacy scale were statistically significant(P<0.05). There were significant differences in ERI and factor scores among different age groups(P<0.05). The scores of the elderly over 60 years old were significantly lower than those of other age groups. The score of ERI scale in the illness group was significantly lower than that in the normal group. The internal consistency reliability of the total scale was 0.93, the split-half reliability was 0.90, and the two-week test-retest reliability was 0.60. The internal consistency reliability of each factor was 0.41-0.91, the split-half reliability was 0.41-0.86, and the two-week test-retest reliability of each factor was 0.34-0.57. Conclusion: The Chinese version of ERI has high reliability and validity and can be used to measure the mental health resource level of the Chinese population.

关 键 词：心理健康资源评估量表 汉化 信效度 

分 类 号：R193.2[医药卫生—卫生事业管理]