检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:王可园 齐卫平[1] Wang Keyuan;Qi Weiping
机构地区:[1]华东师范大学马克思主义学院,200241 [2]华东师范大学当代中国政治发展与战略研究所,200241
出 处:《当代中国史研究》2023年第1期96-111,M0006,共17页Contemporary China History Studies
基 金:国家社会科学基金重大项目“新时代中国共产党执政话语体系建构研究”(20&ZD014)的阶段性研究成果。
摘 要:新中国成立以来,海外中国政治研究范式经历了极权主义、派系政治到威权主义的转换,这些研究范式本质上都是从制度价值或意识形态角度认识中国政治制度,认为中国政治体制应当也必将向西方的自由民主体制转型。21世纪以来,海外学者更加关注中国国家治理实践和中国共产党的治国理政能力,认为“政党主导”“适应性治理”“政策试验”以及“战略规划”等是中国国家治理取得成效的重要经验,中国国家治理经验有值得学习之处。上述变化表明,海外中国政治研究出现了从以体制转型为重心向以国家治理为重心的转换,这种转换原因多样,有其可取之处,但也存在一些不足,需要我们认真加以分析。Since the founding of the People's Republic of China,overseas Chinese political research has experienced the transformation of researeh paradigms from totalitarianism,factional politics to authoritarianism.In essence,these research paradigms understood China's political system from the perspective of institutional value or ideology,and believed that China's political system should and would transform to the so-called liberal democratic system in the West.Since the beginning of the new century,overseas scholars have paid more attention to China's national governance practice and the Communist Party of China's ability to govern the country.They believed that"Party leadership","adaptive govermance","policy experiment"and"strategic planning"are important experiences for China's national governance to achieve results,and China's national governance experience is worth learning.The above changes indicate that uverseas Chinese pulitical research las shifed from fucusing on institutional transformation to focusing on national governance.This shift has various reasons and merits,but there are still some shortcomings that need to be seriously addressed.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222