行政审判固有职能的诉讼外包及其检讨——以联席会议滥诉甄别为分析对象  

Outsourcing Litigation of Administrative Jurisdiction Inherent Function and Its Review: Analysis of Joint Conference Abuse Screening

作　　者：梁艺 Liang Yi

机构地区：[1]浙江工业大学法学院,杭州310023

出　　处：《复印报刊资料（诉讼法学、司法制度）》2022年第10期161-170,共10页

基　　金：2022年度浙江省软科学研究计划项目“纠纷预防导向的政府信息公开收费制度研究”(2022C35045);浙江工业大学2021年度校人文社科基金项目。

摘　　要：通过联席会议的方式进行滥诉甄别,呈现了审判权向法院外部流动的趋势,可归属于诉讼外包的一种型态。基于诉讼外包在外包事项上审判辅助职能与审判固有职能的区分,在外包主体上社会化转移与其他权力转移的区分,滥诉甄别属于审判固有职能向其他权力转移的形式。滥诉甄别与司法属性之间存在着较大的张力,包括联席会议与个案处理的不适配性、程序设计上的单方性以及与法院独立行使审判权的背离。滥诉甄别是防御型司法的体现,具体表现在通过组织内部的非正式沟通提高决策效率、从基于权威的审判权转向基于强制的审判权以及作为审判活动功能的规则整合被替换为目标实现。The screening of abusive litigation through joint meetings shows the trend of the flow of trial power to the outside of the court,which can be classified as a type of litigation outsourcing.Based on the distinction between jurisdiction auxiliary functions and jurisdiction inherent functions in outsourcing,and the distinction between social-ized transfer and other power transfer in outsourcing subjects and abusive screening belongs to the form of transferring trial inherent functions to other powers.There is a large tension between abusive screening and judicial properties,including the inappropriateness of the joint meeting and case processing,the unilateral nature of the procedural design and the departure from the independent exercise of the court's judicial power.Abuse of litigation screening is a manifestation of defensive justice,which is manifested in the improvement of decision-making efficiency through informal communication within the organization,the shift from authority-based jurisdiction power to coercion-based jurisdiction power,and the replacement of rule integration as a function of trial activity for goal achievement.

关 键 词：滥用诉权 滥诉甄别 诉讼外包 防御型司法 

分 类 号：D925.3[政治法律—诉讼法学]