上位法依据被废止后的司法解释效力探究  

Effectiveness of Judicial Interpretation after the Abolition of Legislative Basis of Superior Law

作　　者：郑文睿[1] Zheng Wenrui(Institute of Law,Sichuan Academy of Social Sciences,Chengdu 610071,China)

机构地区：[1]四川省社会科学院法学研究所

出　　处：《四川师范大学学报（社会科学版）》2023年第2期64-72,共9页Journal of Sichuan Normal University(Social Sciences Edition)

基　　金：国家社科基金西部项目“设区的市地方立法权运行样本分析和制度回应研究”(17XFX015)的阶段性研究成果。

摘　　要：《民法典》的生效实施,使得9部法律和2部法律解释被废止,附随带来废止后的体系效应,由此产生上位法依据被废止后司法解释效力如何的价值判断问题。对这个问题的回答,有助于为法的效力及其效力来源(影响因素)注入中国智慧元素。为此,需要区分“全部依据被废止型”、“部分依据被废止型”和“无依据被废止型”等三种被废止的上位法依据类型以及“废止”、“修改”和“继续有效适用”等三种清理结果类型,秉承实用主义路径,对司法解释及其条文展开实质判断,逐一甄别,以决定最终到底是无效、分段有效还是一直有效。为优化司法解释清理工作,针对“部分依据被废止型”所对应的司法解释,不宜保留“继续有效适用(一直有效)”的清理结果。The effective implementation of the Civil Code has abolished 9 laws and 2 legal interpretations,which brings about the system effect after the abolition,thus resulting in the value judgment of the effectiveness of judicial interpretation after the abolition of the legislative basis of these superior laws.The value judgement has turned to Chinese wisdom in the effectiveness of law and its source of effectiveness(influencing factors).To this end,it is necessary to distinguish three types of repealed legislative basis of the superior law,namely,all basis repealed,partial basis repealed,no basis repealed,and three types of liquidation results,namely,repealed,modified and continued effective application.Adhering to the pragmatic approach,the judicial interpretation and its provisions should be judged substantively to determine whether they are ultimately invalid,effective in sections or always effective.In order to optimize the liquidation of judicial interpretation,it is not recommended to retain the liquidation results of continuing effective application(always effective)for the judicial interpretation corresponding to the“partial basis has been abolished”type.

关 键 词：上位法 制定依据 司法解释 

分 类 号：D923[政治法律—民商法学]