当代认知生成主义的理论研究进路及其哲学反思  

On the Theoretical Approaches of Contemporary Cognitive Enactivism and Its Philosophical Reflection

作　　者：张铁山[1] ZHANG Tieshan(Institute of Contemporary Marxism,Xinyang Normal University,Xinyang 464000,China)

机构地区：[1]信阳师范学院当代马克思主义研究所,河南信阳464000

出　　处：《信阳师范学院学报（哲学社会科学版）》2023年第2期13-19,共7页Journal of Xinyang Normal University(Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition)

基　　金：国家社科基金一般项目(18BZX053);河南省高等学校哲学社会科学研究优秀学者资助项目(2018-YXXZ-20)。

摘　　要：认知生成主义的产生有其认知科学的学科资源和现象学哲学基础。认知生成主义在挑战、批判并超越传统认知科学研究范式的基础上,目前已经至少发展出了三条理论研究进路:自创生的生成主义、感觉运动的生成主义和激进的生成主义。这三条并存的理论研究进路对认知生成主义研究的侧重点和结论各有不同,表明了当代认知生成主义研究呈现出复杂的“争鸣”现象。这些理论研究进路具有重要的哲学本体论、认识论和方法论意义,但也暴露出一定的模糊性、争议性和不彻底性。因此,我们需要对它们进行哲学反思,这对于揭示当代认知生成主义这一研究纲领的复杂性和对未来生成认知科学的发展具有重要的启示意义。The generation of cognitive enactivism has its disciplinary resources of cognitive science and the foundation of phenomenological philosophy. On the basis of challenging, criticizing and surpassing the paradigms of traditional cognitive science, at least three coexisting theoretical approaches to cognitive enactivism have been developed: autopoietic enactivism, sensorimotor enactivism and radically enactivism. These theoretical approaches have different emphases and conclusions on the research of the theory, which also indicates that the research of contemporary cognitive enactivism presents the landscape of complicated “warring States’ contention”. These theoretical approaches have important ontological, epistemological and methodological significance of philosophy, but also expose the definite fuzziness, controversy and incompleteness. Therefore, we need to give philosophical reflection to them, which is of great significance to reveal the complexity of the research program of contemporary cognitive enactivism and the development of enactive cognitive science in the future.

关 键 词：认知生成主义 自生成 感觉运动 激进 哲学反思 

分 类 号：B023[哲学宗教—哲学理论]