论人文类学术论文中哲学性概念过度使用问题  

Analyzing on the Overuse of Philosophical Concepts in Humanities Academic Papers

作　　者：蒋万胜 Jiang Wansheng(Shaanxi Normal University)

机构地区：[1]陕西师范大学马克思主义学院

出　　处：《写作》2023年第1期103-110,共8页Writing

摘　　要：在我国学术研究活动中存在着对于哲学性概念使用的两种极端方式:一是完全抽掉哲学性概念与现象之间的联系;二是大量使用哲学性概念。目前在有些人文类学术论文中存在着大量堆砌哲学性概念的问题,即存在着对于哲学性学术概念的过度使用问题。究其,就是因为这些人文类学术论文的作者力图通过使用大量哲学性概念来增加论文的信息量、凸显论文的新意。但由于在他们这样做的时候并没有仔细思考这些哲学性概念和与之联结的概念之间关系的合理性,因而就造成使用上的随意性,影响其所作出判断的严肃性和论证的科学性。为此,在人文类学术论文中,我们需要认识和把握对于哲学性概念使用的合理性和合适度,从而增强这类学术论文推理的严谨性和结论的正确性,进而使我国的哲学社会科学研究产出更多高质量的学术作品。There are two extreme ways in the use of philosophical concepts in China’s academic research activities:First one is to completely remove the relationship between philosophical concepts and phenomena;Second,a large number of philosophical concepts are used. At present,there is a problem of piling up a large number of philosophical concepts in some humanities academic papers,that is,there is an excessive use of philosophical academic concepts. The reason is that the authors of these humanities academic papers try to use a lot of philosophical concepts to increase the amount of information and highlight the novelty of the papers. But when they do that,they do not carefully consider the rationality of the relationship between these philosophical concepts and the concepts connected with them,which results in arbitrariness in use and affects the seriousness of their judgments and the scientificity of their arguments. For this reason,in the humanities academic papers,we need to understand and grasp the rationality and appropriateness of the use of philosophical concepts,so as to enhance the preciseness of reasoning and the correctness of conclusions in this kind of academic papers,and thus enable China’s philosophy and social science research to produce more high-quality academic works.

关 键 词：学术研究 学术论文 哲学性概念 学术概念 文风问题 

分 类 号：C03[社会学]