检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:张聪聪 刘爱峰[1] 石佳 赵海飞 靳博 邓秀敏 崔中赏 ZHANG Congcong;LIU Aifeng;SHI Jia;ZHAO Haifei;JIN Bo;DENG Xiumin;CUI Zhongshang(Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology,First Teaching Hospital of Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine,National Clinical Research Center for Chinese Medicine Acupuncture and Moxibustion,Tianjin 300381,China;Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology,Second Teaching Hospital of Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine,Tianjin 300250,China;Endocrinology Department,Binhai New Area Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine,Tianjin 300451,China)
机构地区:[1]天津中医药大学第一附属医院骨伤科,国家中医针灸临床医学研究中心,天津300381 [2]天津中医药大学第二附属医院骨伤科,天津300250 [3]滨海新区中医医院内分泌科,天津300451
出 处:《天津中医药大学学报》2023年第1期29-34,共6页Journal of Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine
基 金:2019年天津中医药大学研究生科研创新项目(YJSKC-20191037)。
摘 要:[目的]通过严格设计的临床随机对照试验,观察定点斜扳法治疗腰椎小关节紊乱的临床疗效,为腰椎小关节紊乱的患者提供更为有效、成功率更高的治疗方法。[方法]将符合纳入标准的48例腰椎小关节紊乱患者随机分为试验组和对照组,每组各24例。试验组与对照组分别采用定点斜扳法和传统斜扳法两种治疗方法,比较两组患者治疗前后视觉模拟评分法(VAS)和腰椎活动度(ROM)评分、压痛值、红外热成像结果及临床疗效。[结果]治疗前两组在VAS和ROM评分、压痛值、温度方面比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。治疗后,两组VAS和ROM评分、温度较治疗前下降,压痛值上升,试验组的改善幅度优于对照组(P<0.01)。治疗后试验组临床有效率为92%,优于对照组的62%(P<0.05)。[结论]与传统斜扳法相比,定点斜扳法力量集中,成功率高,可操作性强,能极大减轻患者腰部疼痛,改善腰部的活动度,对于治疗腰椎小关节紊乱具有更好的临床疗效,具有一定的临床推广应用价值。[Objective]Through a strictly designed clinical randomized controlled trial,the clinical efficacy of fixedpoint oblique rotation method in the treatment of lumbar facet joint disorders was observed,so as to provide a more effective treatment method with a higher success rate for patients with lumbar facet joint disorders.[Methods]The48 patients with lumbar facet joint disorders meeting the inclusion criteria were randomly divided into experimental group and control group,with 24 cases in each group.The experimental group and the control group were treated with fixed point oblique pulling method and traditional oblique pulling method,respectively.The VAS and ROM scores,tenderness values,infrared thermal imaging results and clinical efficacy of the two groups were compared before and after treatment.[Results]Before treatment,there were no significant differences in VAS and ROM scores,tenderness and temperature between the two groups(P<0.05).After treatment,VAS,ROM score and temperature of the two groups decreased compared with before treatment,and the tenderness value increased,and the decreasing range of the experimental group was better than that of the control group(P<0.01).After treatment,the clinical effective rate of the experimental group was 92%,better than that of the control group(62%,P<0.05).[Conclusion]Compared with the traditional oblique pulling method,the fixed-point oblique pulling method has concentrated strength,high success rate,strong operability,can greatly reduce the patient’s lumbar pain,improve the lumbar mobility,has a better clinical effect for the treatment of lumbar facet joint disorders,has a certain value of clinical application.
分 类 号:R244.1[医药卫生—针灸推拿学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.231