论行政处罚法中赋权基层的方式  

The Way of Empowering Grass-roots Power in Administrative Penalty Law

作　　者：梁捷莺 LIANG Jie-ying

机构地区：[1]南京师范大学法学院

出　　处：《江苏警官学院学报》2023年第1期62-70,共9页Journal of Jiangsu Police Institute

基　　金：国家社科基金重大项目“新时代中国改革创新试验的法治问题研究”(18ZDA134);2022年江苏省研究生科研与实践创新课题“改革背景下行政机关职权转移问题研究”(KYCX22_1394)。

摘　　要：新行政处罚法第24条第1款规定的赋权基层方式,既是确保有效赋权和基层行政处罚权正当的关键,也是判断基层行政处罚行为是否合法的重要标准。行政处罚法中赋权基层方式的本质特征在于行政管辖权的转移,但这不同于管辖权转移的一般规则,省级政府作为转移主体的正当性及其独特现实意义使之成为管辖权转移的一种新方式。实践中,地方政府在具体适用过程存在赋权规则笼统、赋权标准模糊以及与行政委托混用等问题,省级政府应根据自身角色定位分别寻求解困之策。The way of empowering grassroots level stipulated in Article 24(1) of the new Administrative Punishment Law is not only the key to ensure effective empowerment and the legitimacy of grassroots administrative punishment power, but also an important standard to judge whether grassroots administrative punishment behavior is legal. The transfer of administrative jurisdiction is the essential feature of this way,but the empowering subject goes beyond the general rule of jurisdiction transfer. The legitimacy and unique practical significance of the provincial government as the transfer subject make it a new way of jurisdiction transfer. In practice, there are some problems in the specific application process of local governments, such as the general rules of empowerment, vague standards of empowerment, and mixed use with administrative entrustment. Provincial governments should seek countermeasures according to their own role positioning.

关 键 词：行政处罚法 赋权基层 行政管辖权 行政处罚权 

分 类 号：D922.1[政治法律—宪法学与行政法学]