后新冠疫情时期应对气候变化的政策:超越资本主义?  

Post-COVID-19 Policy Responses to Climate Change:Beyond Capitalism?

作　　者：马克·迪恩 艾尔·雷尼 刘魁(译)[3] 刘颖(译) 姚松(译) Mark Dean;Al Rainnie;TransLIU Kui;LIU Yin;YAO Song(Australian Institute;University of South Australia;Southeast University)

机构地区：[1]澳大利亚研究所未来工作中心 [2]南澳大利亚大学商学院 [3]东南大学马克思主义学院

出　　处：《南京林业大学学报（人文社会科学版）》2023年第1期13-28,共16页Journal of Nanjing Forestry University(Humanities and Social Sciences Edition)

基　　金：国家社会科学基金项目“21世纪马克思主义的生态政治理论发展趋向研究”(19BKS077)。

摘　　要：来自各个政治派别的评论员们都对新冠疫情在社会、政治和经济等方面的后果进行了阐释,并一致认为,伴随着气候变化,政府需要采取干预主义政策以应对新冠疫情。本文将绿色增长界定为应对新冠疫情与气候变化双重危机的“任务导向型策略”,并考察了在气候变化和新冠疫情时代政府在处理环境问题时角色发生的变化。新冠疫情与气候危机都已经并还将继续对工作和就业产生重要影响。于是,我们评估了新冠疫情对气候变化的影响并问道:应对新冠疫情危机的任务导向型策略会在多大程度上影响应对气候变化的行动?紧接着,我们广泛考察了新冠疫情对全球劳动力的影响,并更仔细地审视了一系列可能对澳大利亚产生影响的政策,评估了它们在“生态现代化”理论范围内的立场,指出其进一步的发展能够推动超越资本主义应对措施的产生。Commentators across the political spectrum have interpreted the social,political and economic consequences of the COVID-19 pandemic and invariably suggested that,along with climate change,the COVID-19 pandemic requires an interventionist policy response from government.In this paper,we interpret definitions of green growth as“mission-oriented approaches”to the“twin crises”of the COVID-19 pandemic and climate change,examining the changing role of the state in confronting environmental issues in an era of climate and health pandemic.Both events have had,and will continue to have,important implications for work and employment.Thus,we evaluate the impact of COVID-19 on climate change,asking:to what extent have mission-oriented policy responses to COVID-19 impacted climate change action?We then broadly examine the impact of COVID-19 on labour globally and more closely,the possible impacts of a range of policy response options for Australia,assessing their position on a theoretical spectrum of“ecological modernization”that points to further policy development that can push responses beyond capitalism.

关 键 词：新冠疫情 气候变化 绿色新政 生态现代化 

分 类 号：D035[政治法律—政治学] P467[天文地球—大气科学及气象学]