传统术式与宫腔镜下切除术式治疗宫颈息肉的临床效果比较  

Comparison of clinical effects between traditional and hysteroscopic resection for cervical polyps

作　　者：蔡春花 Cai Chunhua(Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology,Daji Town Health Center,Cao County,Heze Shandong,274400,China)

机构地区：[1]曹县大集镇卫生院妇产科,山东菏泽274400

出　　处：《中外女性健康研究》2023年第2期53-54,126,共3页Women＇s Health Research

摘　　要：目的:探究宫颈息肉患者行传统术式和宫腔镜下切除术式的疗效差异。方法:随机选择本院在2019年10月至2020年10月收治的80例宫颈息肉患者为研究对象,按数字随机方法分为研究组和对照组,每组患者40例。对照组行传统术式,研究组行宫腔镜下切除术式,对比两组患者治疗有效率、术中出血量和术后并发症发生情况。结果:研究组的治疗有效率为97.5%,术中出血量(33.71±2.48)mL,术后并发症发生率为2.5%,而对照组三项指标分别为80.0%、(54.12±3.07)mL、15.0%,差异统计学有意义(P<0.05)。结论:宫颈息肉患者行宫腔镜下切除术式治疗,对比传统术式可进一步提高治疗有效率,减少术中出血和术后并发症,值得临床应用。Objective:To explore the difference of curative effect between traditional and hysteroscopic resection for cervical polyps.Methods:From October 2019 to October 2020,80 patients with cervical polyps admitted to our hospital were randomly selected as the research object,and divided into study group and control group according to digital random method,with 40 patients in each group.The control group received traditional operation,and the research group received hysteroscopic resection.The treatment efficiency,intraoperative blood loss and postoperative complications were compared between the two groups.Results:In the study group,the effective rate was 97.5%,the average amount of intraoperative blood loss was(33.71±2.48)mL,and the incidence of postoperative complications was 2.5%,while in the control group,the three indexes were 80.0%,(54.12±3.07)mL,15.0%,respectively,the differences were statistically significant(P<0.05).Conclusion:Compared with traditional operation,hysteroscopic resection for cervical polyps can further improve the treatment efficiency,reduce intraoperative bleeding and postoperative complications,which is worthy of clinical promotion.

关 键 词：传统术式 宫腔镜下切除术式 宫颈息肉 

分 类 号：R711.32[医药卫生—妇产科学]