检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:刘悦 Liu Yue
机构地区:[1]同济大学建筑与城市规划学院
出 处:《城市建筑》2023年第5期62-67,共6页Urbanism and Architecture
摘 要:共享街道是一种让人车共同使用街道空间,进而鼓励行人活动的设计理念,自20世纪60年代提出以来,已被多个国家采纳,并应用到实际建设中。文章运用空间句法与多源城市数据对新西兰Fort street、德国Bremer street、丹麦superkilen、荷兰Zuiderbuurt、英国Exhibition Road、西班牙C.de Carretas、中国上海苏州河虹口段7个建成的共享街道案例的机动性、可达性、可通行性、边界和视野进行分析,通过OSM数据和街景数据,分析共享街道的当前使用情况,并收集使用评价,总结了共享街道与人车分离街道在空间认知和安全方面的差异,并在此基础上从障碍物设置、隐性流线规划、街道界面层次感等方面,归纳有利于提高安全性的共享街道设计方法,以期为城市更新和街道复兴提供参考。Shared street is a design concept that allows vehicles,pedestrians,and non-motorized vehicles to share the same street space in order to encourage pedestrian activity.Ever since its introduction in the 1960s,this theory has been adopted in many countries and applied to the practice.This paper uses spatial syntax and multi-source urban data to analyze the mobility,accessibility,availability,boundaries and horizon of seven completed shared streets:Fort street(New Zealand),Bremer street(Germany),superkilen(Denmark),Zuiderbuurt(Netherlands),Exhibition Road(UK),C.de Carretas(Spain),and Suzhou River Hongkou section(China).By using OSM data and streetscape data,the current usage status of these shared streets was analyzed and usage evaluation results were collected.This paper compares the differences in spatial perception and safety between shared streets and normal streets,and on this basis,concludes the design methods of shared streets that are conducive to improving safety from the aspects of the setting of obstacles,the planning of hidden streamlines,and the hierarchy of street interfaces,in order to provide a reference for urban renewal and street renovation.
分 类 号:TU984.2[建筑科学—城市规划与设计]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.49