破产行政化的理论阐释、功能反思与制度应对  

The Theoretical Explanation,Functional Reflection and Institutional Response to the Administration of Bankruptcy

作　　者：张世君[1] Zhang Shijun

机构地区：[1]首都经济贸易大学法学院

出　　处：《政法论坛》2023年第2期121-132,共12页Tribune of Political Science and Law

基　　金：国家社科基金项目“企业社会责任的法律实现机制研究”(18FFX027);北京市社科基金重点项目“主动治理中的多元参与机制研究”(22FXA002)的阶段性成果。

摘　　要：当前,我国破产法适用中出现了一定的行政化现象,其有着深刻的社会根源与规范根源。破产行政化是行政权力对破产程序的渗透,虽然适应了风险社会中破产案件处理的快速化需求,但也使得司法权力的行使空间受到挤压,易导致妨碍程序正义,激发行政权力扩张,破坏司法信任等消极影响。应当以审慎、平衡作为破产程序中行政权力与司法权力关系处理的基本理念,根据行政权力介入破产程序的性质将之类型化,以制度厘清行政权力在破产法适用中的边界,更好推进我国的破产法治事业。At present,there is a certain phenomenon of administration in the bankruptcy procedure in China,which has deep social roots,legal system implementation roots.The administration of bankruptcy is the penetration of administrative power into the bankruptcy procedure,which meets the needs of the rapid processing of bankruptcy cases in the risk society but makes the space for the implementation of jurisdiction squeezed,which is possible to cause negative effects such as damaging procedural justice,stimulating the expansion of administrative power,and undermining judicial credibility.Therefore,we should take prudence and balance as the basic principle of dealing with the relationship between administrative power and judicial power in the bankruptcy procedure,classify it according to the nature of the involvement of administrative power in the bankruptcy procedure,and clarify the boundary of administrative power in the application of the bankruptcy law by system,so as to promote the development process of the Bankruptcy Law better in China.

关 键 词：破产程序 行政权 司法权 风险社会 破产法 

分 类 号：D922.291.92[政治法律—经济法学]