论股东派生诉讼审查程序的构造机理与规范路径  

Research on the Review Procedure of Shareholder Derivative Litigation

作　　者：王丹[1] Wang Dan

机构地区：[1]北京建筑大学城市经济与管理学院

出　　处：《政法论坛》2023年第2期144-156,共13页Tribune of Political Science and Law

基　　金：北京市属高校基本科研项目“创业投资模式与公司法的适应性研究”(X18295)的阶段性成果。

摘　　要：我国股东派生诉讼规定中仅有前置请求程序而无审查程序,对于股东起诉不构成实质性障碍,无法实现提前过滤无价值诉讼的功能。在当前公司法修改背景下,股东派生诉讼的生长土壤和发展路径将发生变化,制度潜力逐渐展现,股东派生诉讼增设审查程序将在顺应股份有限公司制度扩张需要、促进公司监督机关职能发挥、协调诉讼动力不足与滥用诉讼之间的矛盾等方面,对我国当下公司治理水平的提高发挥作用。2021年《公司法修订草案》中关于公司组织机构及相关内容的多处修改,为今后股东派生诉讼程序的改革提出了新命题。在考察借鉴英美国家股东派生诉讼审查程序的构造机理基础上,建议通过增加公司内部审查回应流程、探索外部独立审查制度、建立司法预先审查机制的路径,设置我国股东派生诉讼审查程序规范。In the regulations of shareholder derivative litigation,there is only a pre-request procedure but no review procedure,which does not constitute material barriers to shareholder litigation,and it cannot fllter the non-value litigation in advance.Under the background of the current revision of Company law,the growing soil and development path of shareholder derivative action will change,and the system potential will gradually show.Review procedure could meet the expansion needs of the joint-stock company and promote the function of the company supervision authority.In addition,it could coordinate the contradiction between insufficient motivation to file a suit and abuse of valueless litigation.In the 2021 Company Law Revised Draft,many amendments to the company’s organizational structure have put forward the reform of shareholder derivative proceedings in the future.Based on the investigation of construction of shareholder derivative litigation in the U.K.and the U.S.A,it is suggested that we should set up the review procedure by increasing the company’s internal review response process,exploring the external independent review system,and establishing judicial review procedure.

关 键 词：审查程序 股东派生诉讼 审查标准 

分 类 号：D922.291.91[政治法律—经济法学] D925[政治法律—法学]