表见代理司法裁判中法官集体行动逻辑实证研究  

An Empirical Study of the Judge’s Logic Action in Apparent Agency

作　　者：廖振中[1,2] Liao Zhenzhong

机构地区：[1]西南财经大学法学院 [2]西南财经大学金融法研究中心

出　　处：《政法论坛》2023年第2期169-179,共11页Tribune of Political Science and Law

基　　金：国家社科基金一般项目“我国政府与社会资本合作合同规制失灵的多元协同治理研究”(20BFX048)的阶段性成果。

摘　　要：通过对最高人民法院及全国各高级法院2014—2021年1362份判例的实证考察,揭示了表见代理司法裁判中的法官集体行动,具体表现为外观法理泛化适用、构成要件实用认定及判断标准续造修补。集体行动背后的逻辑是裁判者基于多重后果考量而进行能动司法,同时个案判决认知在多个司法交互场域中互相影响和递归,进而演化出司法裁判“自创生系统”。表见代理司法裁判的“切片样本”分析还表明,本土未来的民法解释体系可能会走向日趋成熟的法学理论、“自上而下”的最高人民法院司法解释及指导性案例以及“自下而上”的法官集体行动司法造法三方“共治共构”的路径。Through the statistical analysis of 1362 Apparent Agency cases of the Supreme People’s court and the national high courts from 2014 to 2021,this paper reveals the judge’s collective action in judicial decisions,which manifested in the generalized application of Apparent Agency,the practical identification of constituent elements and the continuous and renewal repair of judgmental criteria.The logic behind the collective action of judges is the judicial activism of adjudicators based on consideration of social consequence,and diffuses due to the mutual influence and recursion of the cognition of individual judgments in multiple judicial interactive fields,thus evolving the judicial“autopoietic system”.This“slice analysis”also indicates that to increase the mature legal academic research,“top-down”judicial administrative compulsory guidance and“bottom-up”judicial“autopoietic system”,are likely to be the response choice path for China’s civil law interpretation system to flll the gap between abstract law and complex society in the future.

关 键 词：表见代理 外观主义 能动司法 自创生系统 

分 类 号：D923.6[政治法律—民商法学] D926.2[政治法律—法学]