检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:辛莉芳[1] XIN Li-fang(Department of Judicial Application,Shanxi Politics and Law Institute for Administrators,Taiyuan Shanxi 030012,China)
机构地区:[1]山西省政法管理干部学院司法应用系,山西太原030012
出 处:《吕梁学院学报》2023年第1期93-96,共4页Journal of Lyuiang University
摘 要:相较于夫妻之间的财产约定,现行法律对家庭共有财产的规定尚不明确。由于法律依据的缺失,致使实务中对家庭成员之间签订的“财产分割协议”出现了不同的认定。同案不同判的现象使得明确“家庭共有财产”成为目前司法实践中亟须解决的问题。在民事法律体系中设立明确的“家庭共有财产制度”不失为解决这一问题的有效路径。将“家庭共有财产”明晰化,赋予“家庭”独立的法律地位,不仅有助于对家庭成员之间的“财产分割协议”的定性,而且可以使举债主体明确,债权人主张债权更具针对性,从而更好地保护债权人的合法权益。Compared with the property agreement between husband and wife, the current law on the family common property is not clear.The lack of legal basis leads to the different recognitions in practice of the “property division agreement” signed between family members.The phenomenon of different judgments in the same case makes it necessary to clarify “family common property” in the current judicial practice.It is an effective way to solve this problem to set up a clear “family common property system” in the civil legal system.Clarifying “family common property” and giving “family” an independent legal status will not only help to define the “property division agreement” between family members, but also make the subject of debt clearer and creditors’ claims more targeted, so as to better protect the legitimate rights and interests of creditors.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.116.239.148