案件工作量测算的“审判流程—要素法”——以上海市H中院为例的实证研究  

The Trial Procedure-element Method for Measuring the Workload of Judicial Cases——An Empirical Study Based on Intermediate Court H in Shanghai

作　　者：林新波[1] 张新[2] 程金华 Lin Xinbo;Zhang Xin;Cheng Jinhua(China Institute for Socio-Legal Studies,Shanghai Jiao Tong University,Shanghai 200030,P.R.China;Shanghai No.2 Intermediate People’s Court,Shanghai 200070,P.R.China)

机构地区：[1]上海交通大学中国法与社会研究院,上海200030 [2]上海市第二中级人民法院,上海200070

出　　处：《山东大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》2023年第2期47-60,共14页Journal of Shandong University(Philosophy and Social Sciences)

摘　　要：科学测算案件工作量是法官绩效考核和职业发展的公平保障,也是法院进行审判管理和检验改革成效的重要依据,更是推进法院管理现代化的基础性工作。相对于传统的案件工作量测算方法,在司法大数据时代,“审判流程—要素法”是诸多方法中较为科学、简便、可行的一种。该方法的核心思想是,根据法官在审理案件时所需处理的具体事项,将审判流程进行要素切分,通过计算各个流程要素的耗时来测算案件整体的工作量。通过选取上海市H中院,应用该方法开展实证研究,具体测算不同审判庭、审判团队的法官审理一审和二审(再审)案件的平均耗时,填补了中级法院案件工作量测算的空白。实证结果证明,通过构建新型审判团队,由速裁团队分流一定量简单案件,让普通团队专司疑难、复杂、新型案件,能够显著减轻法官工作量,提升审理效率。同时,基于案件审判耗时的统计结果,可以确定绩效考核中各类案件的权重系数,评估各业务条线的审判压力,指明人员调配的方向,并对司法大数据进行经验校准。The court’s caseload measurement refers to the workload measurement of the cases as defined by different types of litigation procedures or court adjudicative rules through certain calculation methods in the same dimension. The caseload measurement is a technique, but it is essential to the effective operation of the judicial system. First of all, the judge evaluation mechanism centered on scientific assessment of work performance is not only an important guarantee for judges to focus on their main occupation and perform their duties, but also an internal driving force for judges to be innovative, standardized, specialized, and professionalized. Secondly, the scientifically measured caseload is an important basis for the people’s court to carry out team management and trial management, to improve the trial quality and efficiency, and, as a measurement index, to test the effect of the judicial reform. Thirdly, the scientific measurement of the court caseload lays down the basis of digitization and automation for building an intelligent court and provides powerful data to support the modernization of both the trial system and the trial management capacity. With regard to the scientific measurement of the court’s caseload, Chinese judicial theorists and practitioners have made many contributive explorations and practices and put forward many proposals with Chinese characteristics. In the era of judicial big data, the Trial Procedure-element Method is a scientific, simple, and feasible method compared with other methods. The core idea of this method is to slice the trial process into procedural elements according to the specific matters that the judge needs to deal with when the case is on trial. By calculating the time spent on each procedural element in the trial process, the overall caseloads can be measured.This paper uses data from Intermediate Court H in Shanghai to carry out an empirical study and it applies the Trial Procedure-element Method to specifically measure the average time spent by judges of dif

关 键 词：案件工作量 审判流程—要素法 案多人少 审判管理 司法大数据 

分 类 号：D926.2[政治法律—法学]