检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:汪敏 王洪友[1] Wang Min;Wang Hongyou(School of law,Southwest University of science and technology,Mianyang,Sichuan 621000,China)
出 处:《中国卫生法制》2023年第2期66-71,120,共7页China Health Law
摘 要:药品可及性问题一直是药品专利权人与社会公众利益冲突的引线,而药品专利强制许可制度作为知识产权保护与限制并存、针对二者平衡博弈的立法设计在我国一直有名无实。除了外部发达国家经贸压力限制以及出于创新激励机制破坏隐患考量外,制度内部规范粗糙笼统、缺乏实用性也是重要因素。阐述药品专利强制许可制度的理论基础、起源发展,通过对比美国对待该制度的态度,结合我国实际,从药品医保准入谈判前置、司法审议救济细化、调整许可期限终止申请负担等方面对我国制度的完善提出建议。The issue of drug accessibility has always been the lead of the conflict of interest between drug patentees and the public, and the compulsory licensing system for drug patents has always been nominal in China as a legislative design for the coexistence of intellectual property protection and restrictions and for the balanced game of the two. In addition to the restrictions on economic and trade pressure in external developed countries and the consideration of hidden dangers destroyed by the innovation incentive mechanism, the rough and general norms and lack of practicality within the system are also important factors. Expounds the theoretical basis and origin of the compulsory licensing system for drug patents, and makes suggestions for the improvement of China’s system by comparing the attitude of the United States towards the system, combined with China’s actual conditions, from the aspects of pre-negotiation of drug medical insurance access, refinement of judicial review and relief, and adjustment of the burden of termination of the license period.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.227