检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:叶永和
机构地区:[1]温州市质量技术检测科学研究院,浙江温州325007
出 处:《中国水泥》2023年第3期102-105,共4页China Cement
摘 要:产品质量抽查中,一项很重要的工作是对抽查情况进行分析与总结,并就抽查出现的问题有针对性地提出解决建议与措施。然而,不同的抽查情况其表述的结果信息是不一样的,不能混为一谈,否则会误导他人的分析与判定思路。本文从抽查控制理论出发,并结合监督抽查的本质与内涵,指出不能简单地把监督抽查情况汇总当作是分析与总结,应正确体现监督抽查的特点,提高监督抽查情况分析与总结的质量。In product quality spot check,analyzing and summarizing the spot check situation,and putting forward targeted solutions and measures for the problems arising from spot check is very important work.However,the result information expressed in different spot check situations is not the same,so it cannot be mixed up,otherwise it will mislead others′analysis and judgment.Based on the random inspection control theory,and combined with the essence and connotation of supervision and sampling inspection,this paper points out that the summary of supervision spot check cannot be regarded as analysis and summary simply,but should reflect the characteristics of supervision spot check correctly and improve the quality of analysis and summary of supervision spot check.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.147