基于科技检测的德格土司官府与民间文书制成材料对比分析  

Comparative Analysis of Paper and Writing Materials of Dege Tusi's Official Documents and Folk Documents Based on Technological Detection

作　　者：宋欣 于晨 SONG Xin;YU Chen(School of Information Resource Management,Renmin University of China,Beijing 100872,China)

机构地区：[1]中国人民大学信息资源管理学院,北京100872

出　　处：《档案学通讯》2023年第2期82-90,共9页Archives Science Bulletin

基　　金：教育部哲学社会科学研究重大课题攻关项目“布达拉宫古籍文献(贝叶经)抢救性保护研究”(19JZD040)。

摘　　要：随着科学技术的进步、档案保护工作的不断深入,科技检测被广泛应用于档案制成材料的成分分析,为档案的保护修复、真伪鉴定和年代断定等提供科学依据。以德格土司官府与民间文书为研究对象,利用显微观察、XRF、FTIR等对其制成材料进行科技检测,在此基础上开展不同用途文书的对比分析。从载体材料来看,官府和民间文书纸张的制作工艺相同,但其外观形貌、纤维原料和老化程度存在差异;从字迹材料来看,两种文书的字迹材料中均含有果胶和酯类物质,与纸张的结合方式都为“渗透+结膜”,但官府和民间文书的具体字迹成分不同,字迹清晰度也有差别。With the progress of technology and the deepening of archives preservation,technological detection has been widely used in the composition analysis of archives,providing scientific basis for archives protection and restoration,authenticity identification and dating.In this paper,microscopic observation,XRF and FTIR were used to make a comparative study on the paper and writing materials of official documents and folk documents.The authors found that the manufacturing process of paper for official documents and folk documents was the same,but there were differences in appearance,raw material and aging degree of paper.The writing materials of official documents and folk documents contain pectin and ester substances,and the combination of writing materials and paper is infiltration and conjunctiva,but the composition and clarity of handwriting are different.

关 键 词：科技检测 官府文书 民间文书 制成材料 成分分析 

分 类 号：G273.3[文化科学—档案学]