“学院派”文学批评文体的困境及突破路径  

The Dilemma and the Way Out of Academic Style of Literary Criticism

作　　者：姚晓雷 Yao Xiaolei

机构地区：[1]浙江师范大学人文学院,金华321004

出　　处：《中国文学批评》2023年第1期96-103,M0005,共9页Chinese Journal of Literary Criticism

基　　金：国家社会科学基金重点项目“‘50后’作家的文学经验与问题研究”(20AZW018)阶段性成果。

摘　　要：以“科学化”为核心追求的“学院派”文学批评文体的出现及流行有其合理性和必然性,但在目前的文学研究中已经出现了许多流弊。解决这些流弊不仅要靠强化学术规范,还需要这种文体的自我完善,重建和“文学化”文学批评文体有机融合的批评便是其自我完善的路径之一。这并非全面回归“文学化”文学批评文体范式,而是基于文学研究所具有的“准科学化”的内在属性,在以理性和逻辑的最大限度来理解文学研究对象的前提下,在科学和理性未能完全覆盖的区域,给研究主体的文学化感悟及发挥留下合理的空间。Centering on the pursuit of"scientization,"the emergence and prevalence of the academic style of literary criticism is rational and inevitable.However,many abuses have been arisen in the current liter-ary research.To solve those abuses,we not only relies on strengthening the academic norms,but alsol with the help of the self-improvement of the style.One of the pathway is to rebuild a criticism that is or-ganic integration with the"literalization"of literary criticism style.It does not mean a full return to thel paradigm of"literalization"of style of literary criticism,but based on inherent"quasi-scientific"naturel of literary research,leaving reasonable spaces for research subject's literary perception and developmentin the uncovered areas by science and rationality,on the prernise of understanding the object of literary research in the maximum rationality and logic.

关 键 词：科学化 文学批评文体 困境 突破 

分 类 号：I206.7[文学—中国文学]