作为批评文体的评点及其当代意义——从“茅评本”谈起  

The Ping Dian(Comment and Critique)as a Style of Literary Criticism and Its Contemporary Significance:Starting from Mao Dun-Commented Version on Modern and Contemporary Literature

作　　者：肖进 Xiao Jin

机构地区：[1]上海政法学院语言文化学院

出　　处：《中国文学批评》2023年第1期104-113,M0005,共11页Chinese Journal of Literary Criticism

基　　金：国家社会科学基金后期资助项目“作为‘文艺生产’的新中国文学批评建设(1949—1966)”(20FZWB026)阶段性成果。

摘　　要：评点是中国传统批评文体之一种。1996年《中国现当代文学茅盾眉批本文库》的出版,使评点这一文体重新引起研究者的关注。“茅评本”的特点及其实践证明,评点对于当代文学批评的价值和有效性,而且促使我们思考作为传统批评文体的评点如何进行现代转换。总体来看,一些当代小说的评点实践未获得较大反响,评点作为一种批评文体尚未深度介入当代文学批评。摆脱这种状况,一方面需打破学科之间壁垒分明的机制,呼唤具有打通古今、兼通创作与研究的“通人”;另一方面需总结提炼评点实践的经验和理论,使之成为当代文学批评话语的有机组成部分。The issue of A Collection of Mao Dun's Notes and Commentaries on Chinese Modern and Contem porary Literature in 1996,has rekindled attention of researchers over ping dian.The characteristics and practice of"Mao Dun-Commented Version"have verified the value and effec-tiveness of ping dian on contemporary literary criticism.prompting the thought of how to make this traditional criticism style a modern transformation.In general,the practice of ping dian on some contemporary novels has not received much response which shows it has not deeply engaged into contemporary literary criticism as a critical style.To get rid of such dilemma,on the one hand,the mechanism with clear barriers between disciplines needs to be broken,and all-round persons who perceive both ancient and modern,and proficient in both creation and research are in need;on the other hand,it is necessary to summarize and refine the experience and theory trom the practice of ping dian,so as to turn it into an organic component of discourse of contemporaryl literary criticism.

关 键 词：“茅评本” 评点 文体 当代文学 茅盾 

分 类 号：I206.7[文学—中国文学]