检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:薛晴 Xue Qing(School of Marxism,Tianjin University of Technology,Tianjin 300384,China)
机构地区:[1]天津理工大学马克思主义学院,天津300384
出 处:《河北工业大学学报(社会科学版)》2023年第1期71-78,共8页Journal of Hebei University of Technology:Social Sciences Edition
基 金:国家社会科学基金一般项目(17BKS061)。
摘 要:以唯物史观为指导,对当前农民阶层分化的几个模糊认识进行了辨析。认为:贫富分化在成因本质、运行机制等方面与农民阶层分化有着根本区别,以此说明农民阶层分化是偏执于一隅的错误推理演绎;不平等、不公平与农民阶层分化虽然在概念内容上存在一定的交叉性,但因其所涵盖范围、侧重点差异较大,以此来说明农民阶层分化不但不会形成正确认识,反而会进一步强化公众焦虑;以阶层固化来说明农民阶层分化的错误根源在于,既没有看到劳动方式对阶层关系的决定性作用,也没有严格意义上的调查数据支撑,更没有看到持续增强的农民向上性阶层流动的制度性机会。This paper has analyzed some confusion over the present class divide of Chinese farmers from the perspective of historical materialism.The divide between the rich and the poor is fundamentally different from the class divide of farmers in terms of basic reasons and operating mechanism,thus demonstrating that the present class divide of farmers is a wrong notion.Secondly,although there is an overlap between the two conceptions,namely,the lack of equality and fairness and the class divide of farmers,the public worries will be strengthened and misunderstandings will be formed if the latter is explained by means of the former.This is due to the great differences in scope and focus within the the conception of inequality and unfairness.Accordingly,accounting for the class divide of farmers via social class rigidity not only ignores the decisive role of labor mode in class relations but also lacks the support of empirical data.Besides,this explanation neglects the increasing systematic opportunities with which farmers can work their way to the upper social ladder.
关 键 词:农民阶层分化 贫富分化 不平等 不公平 阶层固化
分 类 号:D422[政治法律—政治学] D663[政治法律—国际共产主义运动]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222