3种人工结香的沉香质量分析  

The Quality Analysis of Agarwood Produced by Three Artifical Inducing Methods

作　　者：叶海燕[1] YE Haiyan(Fujian Academy of Forestry Sciences,Fuzhou 350012,Fujian,China)

机构地区：[1]福建省林业科学研究院,福建福州350012

出　　处：《福建林业科技》2023年第1期23-30,共8页Journal of Fujian Forestry Science and Technology

基　　金：福建省科技计划项目(白木香结香技术研究,2017R1011-3)。

摘　　要：于2018年,对3种人工结香(物理结香(火烙法)、化学结香、微生物结香)所得的沉香样品开展浸出物含量测定、薄层色谱鉴别、特征图谱鉴别和化学成分分析,比较其沉香的质量差异,并与2份野生沉香(虫漏、蚁沉)进行比较。结果表明:①除物理结香(火烙法)的沉香浸出物含量为7.49%(<10%),不符合沉香检测标准外,其它沉香浸出物均达到检测标准,其中化学结香浸出物含量最高达到39.29%。②沉香检测样品中均检测到倍半萜类及2-(2-苯乙基)色酮类化合物,且总和均超过50%,表明3种人工结香方法均可产生沉香。③微生物结香的沉香,倍半萜和2-(2-苯乙基)色酮类成分相对含量之和高于自然结香,且其它各项指标均符合沉香检测标准,是较好的结香方法。In 2018,the extraction content,TLC identification,characteristic spectrum detection and chemical composition identification of agilawood samples obtained by physical incense binding(fire burning method),chemical incense binding and microbial incense binding,the quality was compared and analyzed.The results showed that①only the content of the extract of the physical incense(cauterization)is 7.49%,less then 10%,which did not meet the detection standard of Aquilaria sinensis in the 2015 edition of the Pharmacopoeia of the People′s Republic of China,and other methods met the detection standard,among which the highest content of chemical extract was 39.29%;②sesquiterpenes and 2-(2-henylethy)chromones were detected in all the samples,and the total content was more than 50%,which indicated that all the three artificial methods could produce agilawood.③The relative contents of sesquiterpenes and 2-(2-henylethy)chromones in the microbially formed agilawood were higher than those in the naturally formed agilawood,and other indicators were in line with the detection standards of Aquilaria sinensis in the 2015 edition of the Pharmacopoeia of the People′s Republic of China,so it was a better method for forming agliawood.

关 键 词：白木香 结香方法 沉香质量 

分 类 号：S789[农业科学—林学] Q946.8[生物学—植物学]