机构地区:[1]复旦大学附属华山医院浦东院区手术室,上海201206 [2]复旦大学附属华山医院虹桥院区NICU,上海201399
出 处:《海南医学》2023年第6期782-786,共5页Hainan Medical Journal
基 金:上海市科学技术委员会项目(编号:09411961500)。
摘 要:目的探究内镜逆行胰胆管造影术(ERCP)联合腹腔镜胆囊切除术(LC)对急性胆源性胰腺炎的治疗效果及最佳手术时机的选择。方法回顾性分析复旦大学附属华山医院2020年1月至2022年1月期间收治的124例急性胆源性胰腺炎患者的临床资料,根据手术方案的不同分为联合组(接受ERCP联合LC治疗)72例和开腹组(接受传统开腹治疗)52例;联合组再根据手术时间分为早期组(发病48 h内手术)30例和延期组(发病48 h后手术)42例。比较早期组、延迟组及开腹组患者的围手术期指标[术中出血量、恢复肠内营养天数、结石清除率、腹痛缓解时间、术后住院时间]及术后并发症发生情况;比较三组患者术前及术后7 d肝功能指标[总胆红素(TBIL)、γ-谷氨酰基转移酶(γ-GT)]、白细胞计数(WBC)、血清淀粉酶(SAMY)和血清炎症应激指标[C反应蛋白、白细胞介素-8(IL-8)、血清内皮素(ET)]。结果早期组、延期组及传统开腹组患者的术中出血量[(51.42±15.68)m L vs(50.66±15.05)m L vs(84.35±25.40)m L]、恢复肠内营养天数[(1.91±0.60)d vs(2.13±0.73)d vs(2.43±0.76)d]、腹痛缓解时间[(3.48±1.14)h vs(3.67±1.17)h vs(4.84±1.61)h]及术后住院时间[(9.34±2.4)d vs(12.05±3.72)d vs(13.19±4.03)d]比较,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05),但三组患者的结石清除率和并发症发生率比较差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05);三组患者术前的血清TBIL、γ-GT、WBC、SAMY、CRP、IL-8、ET水平比较差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05),但早期组、延期组及传统开腹组患者术后7 d时的血清TBIL[(17.55±4.70)μmol/L vs(17.76±4.81)μmol/L vs(26.13±5.64)μmol/L]、γ-GT[(39.23±6.02)U/L vs(41.26±6.47)U/L vs(58.61±7.73)U/L]、WBC[(6.37±2.12)×10^(9)/L vs(6.65±2.21)×10^(9)/L vs(8.73±2.78)×10^(9)/L]、SAMY[(64.73±10.52)U/L vs(68.46±10.8)U/L vs(102.53±13.72)U/L]、CRP[(21.73±7.43)mg/L vs(22.36±7.50)mg/L vs(48.69±11.26)mg/L]、IL-8[(82.15.±16.69)pg/mL vs(84.85±18.43)pg/mL vs(112.38Objective To explore the therapeutic effect of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography(ERCP)combined with laparoscopic cholecystectomy(LC)on acute biliary pancreatitis and the selection of the best surgical timing.Methods The clinical data of 124 patients with acute biliary pancreatitis treated in Huashan Hospital Affiliated to Fudan University were retrospectively analyzed between January 2020 and January 2022.According to different surgical regimens,the patients were divided into combined group(receiving ERCP combined with LC,n=72)and traditional laparotomy group(receiving traditional laparotomy,n=52).According to the operation time,the patients in combined group were further classified into early group(surgery within 48 hours of onset,n=30)and delayed group(surgery after 48 hours of onset,n=42).The perioperative indexes[intraoperative blood loss,the number of days of enteral nutrition recovery,stone clearance rate,abdominal pain relief time,postoperative length of hospital stay]and occurrence of postoperative complications were compared among early group,delayed group,and laparotomy group.The liver function indexes[total bilirubin(TBIL),γ-glutamyltransferase(γ-GT)],white blood cell count(WBC),serum amylase(SAMY)and serum inflammatory stress indexes[C-reactive protein,interleukin-8(IL-8),serum endothelin(ET)]of the three groups were compared before surgery and at 7 days after surgery.Results There were statistically significant differences among early group,delayed group and traditional laparotomy group in terms of intraoperative blood loss[(51.42±15.68)mL vs(50.66±15.05)mL vs(84.35±25.40)mL],the number of days of enteral nutrition recovery[(1.91±0.60)d vs(2.13±0.73)d vs(2.43±0.76)d],relief time of abdominal pain[(3.48±1.14)h vs(3.67±1.17)h vs(4.84±1.61)h]and postoperative length of hospital stay[(9.34±2.4)d vs(12.05±3.72)d vs(13.19±4.03)d](P<0.05);there were no statistically significant differences in stone clearance rate and incidence rates of complications among the three groups(P>0.05).
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...