检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:唐念[1] 孙琦 严颖 孙建伟 蒋洁 TANG Nian;SUN Qi;YAN Ying;SUN Jianwei;JIANG Jie(School of Physical Education,Huzhou University,Huzhou 313000,China;The First Affiliated Hospital of Huzhou University,Huzhou 313000,China)
机构地区:[1]湖州师范学院体育学院,浙江湖州313000 [2]湖州师范学院附属第一医院,浙江湖州313000
出 处:《湖州师范学院学报》2023年第2期92-97,共6页Journal of Huzhou University
基 金:浙江省哲学社会科学领军人才培育课题(引进人才支持)子课题(23YJRC15ZD-1YB);科技部重点研发计划(主动健康和老龄化科技应对专项)(2020YFC2007205).
摘 要:为观察运动疗法联合电针治疗羽毛球运动肩袖损伤的临床疗效,按照纳入排除标准选取90例患有肩袖损伤的羽毛球运动者,并将其随机分为运动组、电针组和联合组,每组30例.运动组采用运动疗法,电针组采用电针治疗,联合组采用运动疗法联合电针治疗.各组每日治疗1次,共治疗4周.在治疗前和治疗后4周,通过肩关节功能评分(Constant Murley)和关节活动度评定其效果,并记录不良反应.经组内比较发现,3组患者治疗后较治疗前的Constant Murley评分、关节活动度测量(Rangeofmotion,ROM)得分均有统计学差异(P<0.05),且数值提高.经组间比较发现,治疗前3组患者的Constant Murley评分、ROM得分均无统计学差异(P>0.05),治疗后3组患者的Constant Murley评分、ROM得分均有统计学差异(P<0.05).进一步两两比较发现,联合组的Constant Murley评分、ROM得分与电针组、运动组比较均有统计学差异(P<0.05),电针组与运动组比较也有统计学差异(P<0.05).各组患者在治疗过程中均无不良反应及并发症出现.3种干预方法均有效,且运动疗法联合电针治疗对轻中度羽毛球运动员肩袖损伤的疗效优于单纯运动疗法和单纯电针治疗,电针疗法优于运动疗法.To observe the clinical effect of sports therapy combined with electroacupuncture on rehabilitation of rotator cuff injury in badminton,90 badminton athletes with rotator cuff injury were randomly divided into exercise group,elcctroacupuncture group and combined therapy group with 30 cases in each one.The exercise group received exercise therapy for rehabilitation,the elcctroacupuncture group adopted elcctroacupuncture,and the combined therapy group used a combination of exercise therapy and elcctroacupuncture.All groups were treated once a day for 4 weeks.Outcomes were assessed by Constant—Murley and range of motion before and 4 weeks after treatment,and adverse effects were recorded.Constant—Murley scores and ROM(Rangcofmotion)scores were statistically different in the 3 groups after treatment compared to baseline(P<0.05),with improvement in scores.Comparison between groups:the differences in Constant-Murley scores and ROM scores between the three groups before treatment were not statistically significant(P>0.05).After treatment,the differences in Constant—Murley scores and ROM scores among the three groups were statistically significant(P<0.05).The results of post Hoc tests showed that the Constant—Murley scores and ROM scores of the combined group differed from both the elcctroacupuncture group and the exercise group(P<0.05).There were also statistically significant difference between the electroacupuncture group and the exercise group(P<0.05).No adverse effects and complications were observed in any group.All three interventions were effective,hut exercise therapy combined with elcctroacupuncture was better than both exercise therapy as well as elcctroacupuncture alone for mild and moderate rotator cuff injuries in badminton players,and elcctroacupuncture was superior to exercise therapy.
关 键 词:运动疗法 电针 羽毛球运动员 肩袖损伤 疗效分析
分 类 号:G804.53[文化科学—运动人体科学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.145