检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:马成昌 王晓霞 MA Chengchang;WANG Xiaoxia(School of Humanities and Law,Northeast Forestry University,Harbin,Heilongjiang 150006,China)
机构地区:[1]东北林业大学文法学院,黑龙江哈尔滨150006
出 处:《福建技术师范学院学报》2023年第1期39-46,共8页JOURNAL OF FUJIAN POLYTECHNIC NORMAL UNIVERSITY
摘 要:功利主义因其主张的苦乐量化原理一直遭受学界批判,长期以来这一立法原则作为边沁法学理论的重要内容也难以得到正名,而法律拟制理论从本体论角度出发,能够阐释痛苦与快乐作为唯一实存体的根本原因,以此维护功利主义立法原则存在的机理。拟制体将法律纳入其中,搭建起立法与功利原理的桥梁,理清功利主义立法脉络,能够更加鲜明地凸显功利主义立法原则存在的必要性与合理性。On one hand,Utilitarianism has been criticized by the academic circles because of its quantitative principle of bitterness and pleasure.In the meanwhile,it has been difficult to justify such legislative principles which serve as an important content of Bentham[KG-1mm][XCAS1.TIF;%100%100,JZ]s Legal Theory for a long time.On the other hand,the Legal Fiction Theory can explain the fundamental reasons for bitterness and pleasure as the sole entity from the perspective of Ontology,so as to maintain the existence mechanism of Utilitarian Principles in legislation.Generally speaking,by incorporating the law,the fictional body builds a bridge between legislation and utilitarian principles,and clarifies the context of Utilitarian Legislation,which can more clearly highlight the necessity and rationality regarding the existence of Utilitarian Principles in legislation.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.148.223.53