司法场域中《公共图书馆法》表达与实践(2018-2021)——以法院165份裁判文书为研究样本  

Empirical Study on Judicial Application of Public Library Law(2018-2021):A Sample of 165 Court Decisions

作　　者：张健[1] 张东禹 Zhang Jian;Zhang Dongyu(School of Law,Jiangsu University)

机构地区：[1]江苏大学法学院,江苏镇江212013

出　　处：《图书馆杂志》2023年第2期36-43,共8页Library Journal

摘　　要：《公共图书馆法》司法适用是检验该法立法效果的重要标准,也为推动该法的未来完善提供了观察的窗口。《公共图书馆法》自2018年颁布至今,在司法实践中发挥了一定的作用。对该法颁布实施后的三年来的165份裁判文书统计分析发现,《公共图书馆法》司法适用呈现案件逐年递增、区域分布不均、法院层级下移等特点。司法实践中,《公共图书馆法》发挥了权利主张、价值宣示与规范强制等功能。不过,该法存在宣示性条款较多、直接约束力较弱以及司法适用频率较低等问题。未来,需提高《公共图书馆法》立法质量、完善法院裁判文书说理内容、加大普法力度,更好地促进我国公共图书馆事业进一步发展。The judicial application of the Public Library Law is an important standard to test the legislative effect of the law,and also provides a window of observation for promoting the future improvement of the law.Since its promulgation in 2018,the Public Library Law has played a significant role in judicial practice.Through the statistical analysis of 165 judgment documents in the past three years after the promulgation and implementation of the law,it is found that the judicial application of the Public Library Law shows the characteristics of increasing cases year by year,uneven regional distribution and downward shift in court level.In judicial practice,the Public Library Law claims the rights,declares the value,and enforces standardization.However,the law has many problems,such as excessive declarative provisions,weak direct binding force and low frequency of judicial application.In the future,it is necessary to improve the legislative quality of the Public Library Law,perfect the reasoning component of court judgment documents,and strengthen the popularization of law,so as to better promote the further development of China’s public library cause.

关 键 词：《公共图书馆法》 裁判文书 司法适用 

分 类 号：D922.16[政治法律—宪法学与行政法学]